Animal testing is the use of non-human animals in experiments that seek to control the variables that affect the behavior or biological system under study. The United Kingdom was the first country in the world to implement laws protecting animals. In 1822 an Act to Prevent the Cruel and Improper Treatment of Cattle was passed by Parliament. The UK government has publicly stated that animals are sentient beings, not merely commodities, and has confirmed its commitment to the highest possible standards of animal welfare. Animal Welfare Act, an overhaul of pet abuse laws replacing the Protection of Animals Act, came into force in England and Wales in 2007.
Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Show more types:
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Constituency:
These should be tested on convicts and prison inmates, with the exception of when requiring a need of urgency,
Yes, but not on dogs. Only on deer as there are too many of them. If we can't use wolves lets use vaccines.
Yes for certain very controlled research where it is essential to ensure the drug is safe for human consumption
No, everything should be tested on consenting human adults (regardless of how much this will cost the companies).
Yes, aslong as it's "humain"
depends if it can be avoided
Yes, as it is not something that will hurt them
Yes, as it is not something that doesn't hurt them
Only for medical/vaccines, etc. not cosmetics
It depends what animal it is
No, test them on convicted rapists, sex offenders, murders instead.
Yes, but only on animals that can breed faster and produce offspring in vast qunaities.
If the animal is at risk of dying anyways.
If necessary and humane then yes
Yes, as long as it is not something that will hurt them
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
