Animal testing is the use of non-human animals in experiments that seek to control the variables that affect the behavior or biological system under study. The United Kingdom was the first country in the world to implement laws protecting animals. In 1822 an Act to Prevent the Cruel and Improper Treatment of Cattle was passed by Parliament. The UK government has publicly stated that animals are sentient beings, not merely commodities, and has confirmed its commitment to the highest possible standards of animal welfare. Animal Welfare Act, an overhaul of pet abuse laws replacing the Protection of Animals Act, came into force in England and Wales in 2007.
Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Constituency:
yes but no? dependant on what animals they are as some are very different to humans and some are very similar such as pigs. cosmetics absolutely not
These should be tested on convicts and prison inmates, with the exception of when requiring a need of urgency,
No, instead we should be allowed to test on humans if they have signed up to it, wish to die or have committed the worst possible crimes with undeniable evidence
Providing that any outcome is species relevant and that the benefits could prevent undeniable catastrophe
I think it is acceptable for vital medical research that animals are used but not for cosmetic/beauty products.
only if it’s completely necessary, a human can not be used, and measures are taken to ensure the animal does not come to any harm
Yes for certain very controlled research where it is essential to ensure the drug is safe for human consumption
On vermin's as they poisonous and cause more harm to society and species than good. We need to stop draining cow's for milk, their milk is for their offspring's not designed for humans. Would humans share their milk with animal species.
Don’t test products on animals but humans in a controlled environment. Accelerate drugs testing in humans
Yes, but with very strict rules and guidelines, and checks to make sure the animals are being treated well.
Yes and no as how would new drugs and vaccines , medical devices and cosmetics be published if hasn’t passed animal test
I agree that animals should be allowed to test drugs, vaccines and medical devices, but not the testing of cosmetics.
No, but if its intended purposes for the animals, yeah
Depending on the possible side effects
I am ambivalent on this . Definitely not for cosmetics but life saving vaccines or anti cancer drugs ..
Only if it is not too dangerous substances.
Yes but not for cosmetics and only rodents, no primates, cats,dogs or rabbits
If it is vital to further the scientific research being conducted, However it should not if there are other readily available options
@9MZ7MJ7Plaid Cymru10mos10MO
Yes, but not for cosmetics, only when absolutely essential, and in the most humane way possible, for revolutionary drugs/vaccines not for relives to common ailments
If they are desperate to continue selling then that should be the very least resort, or just test on humans
depends on if the animal is useful to the environment or not
Complicated issue. As a former researcher I appreciate the value of animal testing for medicinal purposes although I don't find it an attractive practice.
Yes but not with the chance of death
Sometimes, with safeguards.
Only where absolutely essential for drugs, vaccines, and medical devices. Never for cosmetics!
Yes but with regulations in place
Yes, as long as there is proof there will be no significant damage to them
Yes until we have the resources for more efficient models
Yes, if no other alternatives are available, and it can truly lead to a positive advance in medicine
If it does not hurt the animal and they are in no pain
Yes but need to make sure it doesn’t kill it
Yes but only for drugs and vaccines
Yes as long as they have passed all prior tests
As long as the testing dose not harm the animals
Only if it dose not harm the animal in any way
Yes, but only if they are unhealthy already and in pain or they are somewhat willing, it should not be a painful experience
Yes, only if absolutely necessary and not for cosmetics.
Small animals yes, pets/larger animals no
Yes, but regulation must be strict to ensure all companies do their utmost to ensure animals are not unnecessarily harmed
Yes but as long as it is needed and the animal is not harmed in any way
There should be either voluntary trials on humans who accept and consent or use criminals as a part of their sentencing should to accept.
Test it on rapists, molesters and other sex offenders
Only if it will be used for severe dieseases
No they should use prisoners facing death row
yes because otherwise we wouldn't know if things would work however, it can also kill a lot of animals and they might wend up extinct
No, unless it will not cause them any distress or harm
Not too many animals and a minority of a species.
No, results from animal testing can not be directly generalized to humans.
Yes but only to a certain Extent of which would have to be discussed
Yes, if no alternative biological substance can be found, or created, for medical purposes—and testing against human subjects is seen as far too risky. Not for cosmetics.
No, there are alternatives like in vitro methods
Yes, only if the animals circumstancially require they're use.
Yes as long as the animals aren't hurt killed at the end of the experiment
If there’s a safer alternative to testing all of the above on beings that aren’t human without a detriment to nature, then yes but, there should be a significant attempt to find safer methods.
Yes but only if it involves no suffering and never for cosmetics.
If its not considered as torcher
acceptable for drugs and vaccines not cosmetics
No - More investment and research needs to be done into using computer modelling as animals are not humans and although similar not exact enough.
they should consider doing more testing first.
Medical yes. Cosmetic - no
No, unnecessary for cosmetics, inefficient in medical practise - diverts money away from finding newer, more effective and efficient methods.
As long as it doesn't hurt them.
yes to medicine trials but not for cosmetics
Only in very specific cases when there isn’t is the safest alternative and only for medicine
Yes, but only in situations where there is no other alternative and the drugs, vaccines, medical devices or cosmetics are essential research to preserve human life. The animals should also be kept in line with research animal welfare.
it depends, if they HAVE to, then sure if not then no
Yes, but only if absolutely necessary and no alternatives available
Yes where absolutely necessary, but consider volunteers who will be paid by the companies who are high earners and likewise should be compelled to pay for treatment of those who suffer side effects. Waivers would need to be used
No it should be for criminals who have committed sexual, murder or terror offences.
Yes, but only if it is done ethically and safely
Yes, but with restrictions and must be done ethically.
Only if the animal is not harmed in any way
Only when absolutely necessary for the health of humans
Yes and no depending on the specific animal being used. And not for cosmetics
Should be allowed for medical reasons but not for cosmetics
Yes, so long as the animal is not in danger of suffering from any harmful effects.
Yes, but the welfare of the animal must be overseen by a specialist, animal testing must only be used in exceptional circumstances, not for cosmetics
Depends how necessary it is.
It depends on how necessary it is.
Yes, but heavily regulated.
Testing should done on humans
Not fully, but only the ones that they are sure won't harm them
Yes and no, test in a humane way
Yes but only if it doesn't result in pain, suffering or death.
Yes but biodiversity should be considered
yes but only on specific animals
@elisegoateLabour4yrs4Y
NOT AT ALL. the animal cannot give informed consent to take part in these tests and studies. also this may kill, inflict detramental impact upon them leading too illness/disease which could ruin the ecosystems.
if it can be proved that it is the only way they can test the product efficiently
yes but not for cosmetics and if it wont harm the animals
It is a difficult question because a lot of good things have come from the findings of these studies however I think the animals should not be harmed and also given the BEST quality of life whilst doing studies.
Yes but would have to meet a stricter criteria from previous clinical trial stages
use rapists, what are they gonna do, say no?
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
