Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Show more types:

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

353 Replies

 @9D4V52Panswered…2yrs2Y

No, it’s multiple **** people (pedos, rapist, murderers) in prisons. As it’s no death penalty use them for testing instead of innocent animals

 @9MV4FB5answered…10mos10MO

Yes, but only for non-cosmetic reasons where no viable and equally as efficient alternative is available so as to protect humans.

 @9FN3TCQanswered…2yrs2Y

No, They Should Be Tested On Murderers And People Who Have Commited Horrible Crimes

 @lunderwood106answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but not for cosmetics. Only until we can use alternatives that are as effective in testing the safety of medical products.

 @8RLWZY3answered…4yrs4Y

Animals should only be used to test the safety of drugs and medicine as a last resort if there is no other option. They should never be tested for cosmetics.

 @8RJWLY7answered…4yrs4Y

Animals should only be used for the testing safety of drugs, vaccines and medical devices as a last resort if there is no other equally effective way

 @8R43KG9answered…4yrs4Y

Only when absolutely necessary, example, treatment that could save thousands of lives and only the absolute minimum of animals used to test, and under the tightest animal welfare protocol. Not for cosmetics.

 @95XB4Q2answered…3yrs3Y

no, but they shouldn't use humans either, develop inanimate object to test safety of products

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...