In October 2019 Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey announced that his social media company would ban all political advertising. He stated that political messages on the platform should reach users through the recommendation of other users – not through paid reach. Proponents argue that social media companies don’t have the tools to stop the spread of false information since their advertising platforms aren’t moderated by human beings. Opponents argue that the ban will disenfranchise candidates and campaigns who rely on social media for grassroots organizing and fundraising.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
@9KSJ3LZ1yr1Y
No but tighter regulations should be implemented to ensure truth and fairness are adhered to and misinformation is removed, acknowledged as such and any further advertising by offending party/individual be prohibited
@9QHMH9D9mos9MO
There should be no political advertising and a more informative civilised approach should be taken to the election as the attempt to discredit other parties is similar watching adults behave in a way that teacher are attempting to correct in children
@9P26G3610mos10MO
The same regulatory standards should be applied for social media advertising as for all other media, for both political and any other advertising.
@9BS43GS2yrs2Y
Yes, but allow advertising strictly for reminding people to vote
@94428Z43yrs3Y
No but there should be a limit to the maximum budget that all parties must adhere to.
@93THDCL3yrs3Y
No, but it should be clear that it is political advertising and should be balanced.
@9386V3L3yrs3Y
Should ban political, religious topics although in order to reduce fake news. Politics, religion and other such topics should have a more managed and monitored platform
@8WQ2B8K3yrs3Y
No, but as long as it’s factual and follows guidelines.
@8TCV5324yrs4Y
only if its right wing, (kill tories)
@8T5YXC74yrs4Y
Yes. Parties would should be prompted to campaign for themselves.
@8T3Z7LC4yrs4Y
No but in order to operate, social media companies must agree to strictly regulate political advertising for fairness and remove any and all ads that are verifiably false - banning repeat offenders.
No, but only if they are not targeted advertisements.
No, but only if ads can be properly regulated and fact-checked
@8R2CVD74yrs4Y
No but if they tell lies they will have consequences
@8QZ4TFL4yrs4Y
I think it should be regulated
@8QXZ2HH4yrs4Y
Political advertising on social media should be equal, non-bias and only censored/removed by an independent body, who deems the content wholly inaccurate/misleading or inciting hate and criminal behaviour
@8PDFPMJ4yrs4Y
All political advertising should be regulated and fact checked
@8Y2LRPB3yrs3Y
I think there should be a level playing field and same amount of money should be spent because there is an inequity. Also I don't trust the government to define what advertising is or isn't.
Only to show what they have already done
@99ZB5972yrs2Y
Kind of Unless If its something bad etc. Abolishing Monarchy, Bringing back communism, etc
@98Z7QJC2yrs2Y
Only extremist political view
@9CJHNNWLiberal Democrat2yrs2Y
Political advertising should be subject to the same regulation as other advertising
The political themes of 6.5k users that upvoted this question
Join in on more popular conversations.
