In November 2019 the UK Labour Party promised that if it won a majority in the upcoming general election it would provide free full-fiber broadband to every home and business the UK by the year 2030. Under the plan the government would nationalize the digital arm of BT (Openreach) and provide over 95% of UK residents with broadband. Currently 7% of households in the U.K. have access to full-fiber broadband. The plan would cost an estimated £230m a year and would be funded by a new tax on large technology companies including Apple and Google. Opponents (including the Conservatives, Lib…
Read moreNarrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Political party:
@8SM5P534yrs4Y
Homes = Yes. Businesses = No.
@9QLM39PLiberal Democrat9mos9MO
No but provide it to UK homes that live in areas that don't have the proper structure. Also provide more access, improve the overall structure.
@9QH3V9W9mos9MO
Unless they can recoup money from elsewhere this will be too expensive, however they could offer a middle ground of subsidised broadband.
I think low income family across the UK, should be given free full fibre broadband, it is an essential in this day and age
@9Q5D5569mos9MO
Yes, but only a basic internet for communicating. You should still be able to have faster, private options, with additional benefits.
@9Q3NFWC9mos9MO
It should be made available to all, using Wibre if necessary, but people should pay with support with the disadvantaged...
@9N882Y610mos10MO
Those that are in areas which broadband speed is slow should recieve standard free wifi, and if they want to upgrade to faster speeds they can do that at extra cost
@9MZSWW310mos10MO
Yes, but only for families with school aged children, university students and those in reciept of benefits
No but the government needs to invest in developing infrastructure to ensure every household has access to full fiber broadband
They should ensure high speed broadband is available at an affordable coat to all households and businesses
@9DNGNBQ2yrs2Y
Yes, but only to those who cannot afford their own
@9XCY2FVLiberal Democrat5mos5MO
No, but free public access to broadband provided by the government should be available in all libraries, schools, medical facilities and dedicated cyber hubs to ensure accessibility for all
@9TQCCGN6mos6MO
If we can afford it without negatively effecting the economy and still focusing on other important stuff then yes
@9M5RHSB11mos11MO
No, but the government should force providers rapidly to roll out full fibre to the majority of the country
@9M43PFV11mos11MO
Government should first check what is the actual profit from new tax and then gradually introduce buying out BT and for example offer broadband cost reimbursement.
@9D26TXW2yrs2Y
No, but those under a low income threshold should receive it free or heavily subsidised
@9BWYF872yrs2Y
No, but broadband should be nationliased
@9BT3H5K2yrs2Y
Free broadband for all UK homes
@9BQ7LXX2yrs2Y
No, this will give leverage to further censorship and a higher state-run media meritocracy
@99YD7KL2yrs2Y
Free provision for low income families and those on income support
@99TV79T2yrs2Y
@96T65VQ2yrs2Y
Perhaps when the economy is in a better state.
@96RVJVH2yrs2Y
Only to those whom can not afford it and it’s use is essential
@96PSNF62yrs2Y
Nationalise broadband to create an output driven service and subsidise broadband for this who are less able to afford it
@964HRWR2yrs2Y
No, but they should incentivise investment in infrastructure
@95XKBQ63yrs3Y
No but all homes should have access to broadband in the same sense as other utilities.
@95WPHGQ3yrs3Y
No, but broadband companies should be regulated to prevent activities such as throttling.
@95SNVZK3yrs3Y
Only to those who can't afford to pay for it themselves.
@95T9NG23yrs3Y
No, but provide free internet to low income families
No, not to businesses, only to homes
Yes, but only to homes in relative poverty
@94CKMVN3yrs3Y
No. Nothing is free. Somebody creates the broadband and will expect payment in the form of a government subsidy.
@93RJZSV3yrs3Y
No, only to businesses classed as small and the lowest income households.
@93QGWBZ3yrs3Y
Only if the government is unable to monitor users.
@93MT4WD3yrs3Y
Yes, Provide to homes who need it
@93JNS5W3yrs3Y
No, but they should offer subsidies for those on lower incomes or on benefits
@934HR4J3yrs3Y
yes because this is necessary to reduce the amount on radiation
@92TLHBV3yrs3Y
No, we have moved past broadband as a planet. We need 4/5G access nationwide.
@92S5Y8X3yrs3Y
No, but assistance should be provided for all homes and businesses to choose and install their own supplier.
@92M28HD3yrs3Y
No, but the government should provide access to as much of the country as possible. We don’t argue this question on the postal network, while it is an absolutely perfect layover of systems, it’s near a human right to have good access to this critical information system.
Yes but should be means tested
@92C9RV73yrs3Y
The government should provide access to internet for all, whether directly or by outsourcing privately, as many areas do not have access and this limits work and educational opportunities. But the monthly cost should be paid by user, like a mobile phone bill or electricity.
@922QMXM3yrs3Y
No but it should be free for those receiving benefits.
@8Z6KJKZLiberal Democrat3yrs3Y
Yes, but only to those deemed to be in the lower socio economic bracket
@8Z43SCF3yrs3Y
No but give grants for low income families.
@8YVD3M23yrs3Y
Not free but supplement the cost for those less well off to ensure good access due to the study and work requirements of Internet access.
@8YGGHN73yrs3Y
Nationalise broadband services and charge w license fee.
@8Y5M6WC3yrs3Y
Only to low income to assist children's learning/job seeking
@Bethrachel3yrs3Y
Yes, for business, children homes and low income families, or have somewhere where people can access internet
@8Y43Y5K3yrs3Y
No, broadband providers should use some of their profits to fund broadband access to the most vulnerable
They should certainly subsidise broadband for the poorest and most isolated
@8WMGGD83yrs3Y
Free or subsidised broadband should be available to low income households
@8VF98P84yrs4Y
No, it should be covered by Universal Credit.
It’s a nice idea in economic boom times but we do not live in an economic boom currently.
@8TL7H524yrs4Y
Small Businesses and poor people
@8TBNKQ94yrs4Y
No, it should be means-tested for households that need it
Provide to those who cannot afford it
@8SSDSKX4yrs4Y
Yes but only for those on low income
@8SP9QXB4yrs4Y
No but more should be done to make sure people have public access to free WiFi in local libraries or community centres.
@Wingfoil4yrs4Y
As part of a benefits package for those that can't afford it
@8SNQSGX4yrs4Y
No this will cost too Much for it to be free but if the government did do it paid for sort of like TV lisances are
@8SNPYSB4yrs4Y
Abolish capitalism and the state
Yes, but means tested, and with commercial competition.
@8SMT6FS4yrs4Y
Should be Means tested for lower income families
No, only to private homes
No, but create a benefit that allows for fair digital inclusion
Yes, to all households who are of a lower income. to be check yearly. Everyone else should pay but there should be a flat rate for household and another flat rate for businesses.
@8SF34T54yrs4Y
Yes, but only to low income groups or families
@Lunabee4yrs4Y
No, but should provide free broadband options for those in need / poverty
Yes, but speed capped at 20mb, public will have to pay to upgrade speed (introduce it in tiers).
@8SBMZ234yrs4Y
Yes, but only businesses, and instate over a long period of time so as to reduce costs.
@8S88LXR4yrs4Y
No broadband should be provided an ban the internet
@8RZNF8Z4yrs4Y
Yes this could potentially boost the economy
@8RW5STH4yrs4Y
Yes, To those below a certain financial threshold
@8RS44954yrs4Y
It should provide broadband to children who have to complete online school but cannot afford wifi
@8RP4VYW4yrs4Y
Yes, but not to all UK homes. Make it a basic support service for those on benefits and with low incomes who cannot usually afford broadband.
@8QTLWKR4yrs4Y
No, but more controls are needed to ensure fair pricing amongst ISPs as they are currently running amok.
@8QRCT8M4yrs4Y
No, current providers’ pricing should be regulated better instead
@8QP988J4yrs4Y
Only to those who are in need, and cannot afford it
@8QK6T2C4yrs4Y
Yes, but only to households which include a student / learner
@8QF5XWQ4yrs4Y
It would depend on who paid for it
@8QDVV8H4yrs4Y
No, but full-fiber broadband should be available to all homes and businesses.
@8QDM7X74yrs4Y
Yes but only to small businesses, not huge corporations. And it should be the basic package with room to improve if the household wants to pay extra
Yes but only to poor household and small businesses
@8Q6F3TY4yrs4Y
Only provide for those that have no access and cannot afford to pay for it.
@8PV5MRH4yrs4Y
yes but only in areas out of cities with poorer comunication
@8PRP3N64yrs4Y
@8PFG4NL4yrs4Y
Yes, but only for those with children who may need it for school
@8NDGLSM4yrs4Y
Yes, but only for households that don’t earn enough
@8LSMHSY4yrs4Y
We should be investing in libraries and other public service to allow people without assess at home to be able to get online
@8H8GCGJ4yrs4Y
Only 50% across the country
Only do 50% of free broadband across the uk
@8DWPVQFLiberal Democrat5yrs5Y
Yes but Only to the houses who can't afford it
@9CGZKN42yrs2Y
No, but they should subsidise costs
@9BXWL5M2yrs2Y
@9BQNQC62yrs2Y
A free tv licence for over 60 year olds instead
@9BFWYPQ2yrs2Y
No, but there should be publicly funded broadband hubs in all libraries providing access free of charge.
@9B49R6D2yrs2Y
No, but there should be adequate public service open 24hrs with broadband to provide the services to house that can’t get it
@99VVJ8C2yrs2Y
Once most of the national debt is removed, then this can be implemented
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.