The World Health Organization was founded in 1948 and is a specialized agency of the United Nations whose main objective is “the attainment by all peoples of the highest possible level of health.” The organization provides technical assistance to countries, sets international health standards and guidelines, and collects data on global health issues through the World Health Survey. The WHO has led global public health efforts including the development of an Ebola Vaccine and the near-eradication of polio and smallpox. The organization is run by a decision-making body composed…
Read moreNarrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Yes, but decrease the amount to preserve our economy, while still maintaining good relations with other organisations and countries.
@9QQQRCJ9mos9MO
I don’t want to have to give money to countries that their own people don’t step up and help. I still believe our country should help European countries.
@9QFZV8D9mos9MO
As long as the money is proportional to what other countries pay and there is a strong say in how it is spent.
Stuck on this one, as on the one hand they provide a lot of net benefits for the world, but on the other hand I can't forget how they downplayed COVID around January 2020, they could've prevented a lot of deaths yet
@9F4FDP72yrs2Y
Depending on state of budget
@8YV6G533yrs3Y
@8XRM65M3yrs3Y
I need to do more research on this topic
The question will be debated, asked and voted on via Liquid Democracy.
@8RZ4GL74yrs4Y
Yes, but decrease the amount, and fund national and local programs instead
@9BNKKW62yrs2Y
Yes, but only for specific programs that help people and not just for the sake of having an organisation
@95WV4PB3yrs3Y
Only countries that need it
@8S4L8LW4yrs4Y
Yes, but make sure they address their clear pro-China bias
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
