In early 2022 the Russian military built up a force fighter jets, air defense systems and 100,000 troops along its border with Ukraine. Military experts say the buildup gives the Russian military an array of options including seizing the entire territory or certain parts within the country. Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union before it collapsed at the end of the Cold War in 1991. The disintegration of the Soviet Union left Russia with a vastly depleted population, territory, and economy. Now Russian President Vladimir Putin is seeking to reclaim some of that glory …
Read more@tommyvelvick2yrs2Y
No, continue to provide military equipment and support but do not send troops.
@9398W962yrs2Y
No, but they should send other forms of aid
@938P7DZ2yrs2Y
No but sanction Russia whilst providing Ukraine with humanitarian and military aid and accepting an acceptable number of Ukrainian refugees
@938FP5T2yrs2Y
No, not until they're a member of NATO
@937TBNH2yrs2Y
No, this will risk a nuclear confrontation
@937GLR22yrs2Y
No, however Ukraine should be armed
@93576NL2yrs2Y
no but provide military and humanitarian aid to Ukraine whilst applying sanctions to Russia and accept a reasonable number of Ukrainian refugees.
@9356TZL2yrs2Y
No but provide military and humanitarian aid to Ukraine whilst applying sanctions on Russia
@934QVLN2yrs2Y
In principal yes, but the threat of nuclear war is too great.
@92RG96X2yrs2Y
No, but keep sending weapons and aid to Ukraine.
Current supply and training is acceptable.
@92R84TX2yrs2Y
I believe in sending aid and weapons to help Ukraine defend itself but entering into a hot war with Russian will dramatically increase the chances of nuclear war
@92QVC9D2yrs2Y
Why only focus on defending Ukraine
@92Q3QKX2yrs2Y
Not if it increases risk world war
@92PTL5G2yrs2Y
@92P6JCJ2yrs2Y
As a last resort if peaceful negotiations fail
@92P6MYZConservative2yrs2Y
They should continue peace talks
@92NZ4YT2yrs2Y
If required if negotiation and peace can’t be achieved.
@jdp20222yrs2Y
more military aid should be sent first and military forces should be a last resort
@92MTZRB2yrs2Y
Yes, however only when a NATO country has been attacked or invaded. Until then supply weapons, tanks, fighter aircraft and aid to Ukraine.
Yes, if there is more civilian killing or use of nuclear weapons
@92LPWL62yrs2Y
Yes, but only if it is necessary or if article 5 is triggered
@92KXNX32yrs2Y
It's complicated. Maybe. But not yet.
@92JWDNR2yrs2Y
No, but it should continue to supply Ukraine with arms, logistical and technical advice
@92JLLL7Conservative2yrs2Y
No but sanction Russia and accept a reasonable amount of Ukrainian refugees whilst providing humanitarian and military aid to Ukraine
@92HC6RB2yrs2Y
No, this would provoke Russia to attack NATO
@92GGL8R2yrs2Y
No, we should be working towards de-escalating the conflicts not only in Ukraine, but also in non-European countries such as Palestine.
@dfpbone2yrs2Y
Yes, but only if there are no other less violent ways of solving the invasion.
@92GB8NK2yrs2Y
That we help Ukraine at all costs without starting WW3
@92FXBSY2yrs2Y
Supplying Weapons and ISTAR info but not boots on the ground, unless nuclear weapons are used then I believe that then the Russian Armed Forces will have crossed a serious red line.
@92FXBSY2yrs2Y
Supplying Weapons and ISTAR info but not boots on the ground,
@92FQ7HR2yrs2Y
Yes, but only if a NATO member is attacked.
@92FC2LM2yrs2Y
Only if Russia uses WMDs
@92DCHHG2yrs2Y
No but provide humanitarian and military aid to Ukraine whilst applying sanctions against Russia and taking in a reasonable amount of Ukrainian refugees
@92D97LC2yrs2Y
No but should take in Ukrainian refugees within reason and provide military and humanitarian aid
@92C85HPLiberal Democrat2yrs2Y
Current measures to punish avoids escalation. More action required if Putin increases pressure.
@92C3V742yrs2Y
No, but provide aid to Ukraine and sanction Russia.
@92BR6762yrs2Y
No, but stop trade with Russia
@9274DGZ2yrs2Y
If required yes, but should support and provoke retaliation. A more diplomatic solution should be sought first
Not enough knowledge on this
@9267SKPPlaid Cymru2yrs2Y
Yes, but only weapons, not manpower
@9267CQT2yrs2Y
Yes, but every other option should be exhausted first - intervening may run the risk of starting a nuclear war
@925ND592yrs2Y
No, we should stay out of the matter
@925ND592yrs2Y
No, we should stay out of it
The U.S. should but NATO should not.
Yes as a last resort to stop war crimes
@9235QMV2yrs2Y
At the request of the Ukrainian government (and with recognition from the U.N.) those wishing to aid Ukraine militarily should be given temporary military access to the country.
@922TV9M2yrs2Y
i don’t support intervention militarily at all.
@9225MXZ2yrs2Y
No, but send humanitarian aid, and take in Ukrainian refugees
