Should the U.S. and NATO use military forces to defend Ukraine from a Russian invasion?

No, but they should send other forms of aid

No, not until they're a member of NATO

No, this will risk a nuclear confrontation

No, however Ukraine should be armed

no but provide military and humanitarian aid to Ukraine whilst applying sanctions to Russia and accept a reasonable number of Ukrainian refugees.

No but provide military and humanitarian aid to Ukraine whilst applying sanctions on Russia

In principal yes, but the threat of nuclear war is too great.

they should if it wouldn’t cause world war 3

only if it left ukraine

No but provide military and humanitarian aid to Ukraine whilst sanctioning Russia and taking in a reasonable amount of refugees

The members as individual countries should be allowed, just not under the NATO flag.

Defend not unnecessarily attack

Britain will not take part militarily. It is not our war to fight.

No, but we should support the militarily with weapons and increase our road defences and forces because he’s coming our way next.

Provide arms, training and intelligence - everything short of active military engagaement

Yes, with a repayment agreement.

Yes if Russia is deemed a direct threat to NATO

No, but keep sending weapons and aid to Ukraine.

Current supply and training is acceptable.

I believe in sending aid and weapons to help Ukraine defend itself but entering into a hot war with Russian will dramatically increase the chances of nuclear war

Why only focus on defending Ukraine

Not if it increases risk world war

At last resort, yes

As a last resort if peaceful negotiations fail

They should continue peace talks

If required if negotiation and peace can’t be achieved.

more military aid should be sent first and military forces should be a last resort

Yes, however only when a NATO country has been attacked or invaded. Until then supply weapons, tanks, fighter aircraft and aid to Ukraine.

Yes, if there is more civilian killing or use of nuclear weapons

Yes, but only if it is necessary or if article 5 is triggered

Not easy to answer

It's complicated. Maybe. But not yet.

No, but it should continue to supply Ukraine with arms, logistical and technical advice

No but sanction Russia and accept a reasonable amount of Ukrainian refugees whilst providing humanitarian and military aid to Ukraine

No, this would provoke Russia to attack NATO

No, we should be working towards de-escalating the conflicts not only in Ukraine, but also in non-European countries such as Palestine.

Yes, but only if there are no other less violent ways of solving the invasion.

That we help Ukraine at all costs without starting WW3

Supplying Weapons and ISTAR info but not boots on the ground, unless nuclear weapons are used then I believe that then the Russian Armed Forces will have crossed a serious red line.

Supplying Weapons and ISTAR info but not boots on the ground,

Yes, but only if a NATO member is attacked.

Only if Russia uses WMDs

No but provide humanitarian and military aid to Ukraine whilst applying sanctions against Russia and taking in a reasonable amount of Ukrainian refugees

No but should take in Ukrainian refugees within reason and provide military and humanitarian aid

Current measures to punish avoids escalation. More action required if Putin increases pressure.

No, but provide aid to Ukraine and sanction Russia.

No, but stop trade with Russia

Not until Russia use chemical weapons

I don't want ww3

Yes, if Russia crosses a line, ie chemical weapons / tactical nukes.

Yes, but only if Russia uses chemical or nuclear weapons.

No, but we should send all the aid we can.

Yes, but actions should be taken to ensure defending Ukrainian is the only priority.

No but provide military and humanitarian aid

If required yes, but should support and provoke retaliation. A more diplomatic solution should be sought first

Not enough knowledge on this

Yes, but only weapons, not manpower

Yes, but every other option should be exhausted first - intervening may run the risk of starting a nuclear war

No, we should stay out of the matter

No, we should stay out of it

The U.S. should but NATO should not.

Yes as a last resort to stop war crimes

At the request of the Ukrainian government (and with recognition from the U.N.) those wishing to aid Ukraine militarily should be given temporary military access to the country.

i don’t support intervention militarily at all.

No, but send humanitarian aid, and take in Ukrainian refugees

If Russia genuinely threatens using nuclear weapons, then yes

They should provide more aid

NATO is a defensive alliance

Only if nato nations are attacked

Back the boys

i dont want to get nuked

Far too complex for here.

Yes as long as nuclear weapons aren’t involved

Probably not on the ground particularly but air-cover for Kiev and links to the west probably reasonable at this point.

If required. Then Yes.

UN peacekeepers

Only as a final resort

Yes, but only if all diplomacy fails

Preventing Russian aggression is important, but unless they are directly attacking nato or out strong allies, military action should be avoided. Aiding in diplomatic attempts to resolve the situation is fine & supplying Ukraine with ammo/weapons, which may be used to threaten Russia & therefore deter them is fine too.

More sanctions should be used before military force

Only if it will prevent a third world war.

Only if atrocities are proven.

Not our war, but to our benefit yes, it would destroy Russia's defence.

US and NATO should use the threat of military force against the Russian government, but diplomatic solutions should remain priority.

No, but we would instead attempt diplomacy

Up to them.

Only if Diplomacy fails first

Yes, but only if Ukraine is endanger of falling

No, and remove the UK from the NATO agreement.

No, but the most serious economic sanctions that are possible should be used in a coordinated way against Russia

It's not for me to day as I dont live there

They are both trying to take over Ukraine for their own gains

I'm currently unsure.

Last resort

NATO should agree to a moratorium on further expansion and try to ease tensions with Russia.

No but sanction Russia whilst providing Ukraine with humanitarian and military aid and accepting an acceptable number of Ukrainian refugees

If their application to NATO is fast tracked - yes. Otherwise no. Or we start WW3.

Possibly depending on the coming actions from Russia.

Nato yes US no