Try the political quiz

15 Replies

 @9M4Y9XQdisagreed…2wks2W

Allowing any aggression from a country to go unchallenged will only ever increase the likelihood that aggression would be used again, as there is no repercussion for doing so. Ie Crimea went unchallenged so the viability of invading the rest of Ukraine is more appealing as it was reasonable to believe to go unchallenged as well (beyond further sanctions)
Supporting Ukraine by providing more military equipment, training etc especially by providing a cost effective method for countering Russia artillery, missile, drones and aircraft will force Russia to commit further resource to maintain there current position. Overall the more expensive and more resistant felt during the War in Ukraine the less appealing further expansion through military force becomes.

 @9FMMN73disagreed…8mos8MO

What if Russia doesn’t stop at Ukraine? What if they take Ukraine and decide they want to move onto Poland, Estonia etc?

 @9GM8SYJConservative disagreed…7mos7MO

We should get involved as if we don't it will eventually end up affecting us in some way or another. Surely if we help Ukraine with Defense Funding it will benefit us in the long run and will give us opportunity for more allies if the situtation worsened and opened up to the rest of the world. Also we are in one of the best situations to give aid as the UK is a part of NATO so if Russias eye turned to us and attacked (worse case scenario), NATO would have to retaliate and I doubt Russia and Putin would want to risk that happening.

 @9G8R98Qdisagreed…7mos7MO

Russia may see this as a threat and start invading the UK which will put millions of peoples life's at risk.

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this answer.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...