Joe Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) in August 2022, which allocated millions to combating climate change and other energy provisions while additionally establishing a $7,500 tax credit for electric vehicles. To qualify for the subsidy 40% of the critical minerals used in electric-vehicle batteries must be sourced in the U.S. EU and South Korean officials argues that the subsidies discriminated against their automotive, renewable-energy, battery and energy-intensive industries. Proponents argue that the tax credits will help combat climate change by encouraging consumers to purchase EVs and stop driving gas powered automobiles. Opponents argue that the tax credits will only hurt domestic battery and EV producers.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Ideology:
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
Yes
@9LSTGVR 10mos10MO
If you can afford to buy an EV then you do not need subsidies. If you want one and can afford one you will get one regardless.
@9LQXLJ810mos10MO
No, electrical vehicles are not very green at all. Disposal of the batteries... worse than all other alternatives
@9GWN98Q1yr1Y
Not everyone can afford an EV so why would subsidies be given to the rich to make them even richer. If anything, EV prices should be lowered and help given to people who can’t afford one to be able to have a plan to change in the future.
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
No
@9GWN98Q1yr1Y
Poorer people cannot afford EV cars so they should be abolished and focus be put on creating more EV cars and lowering the price. Having more chargers and more available to buy.
@9LSTGVR 10mos10MO
If I fill my car with fuel I know I can get to my destination, back and then some. An EV can only drive for so long on a single charge meaning a day out is now filled with the stress of worrying how far away a charging station is. What if I want to tow a caravan? The extra weight will shorten my traveling time. They are heavier than normal cars so more wearing on the roads. I've no desire to purchase one and couldn't afford one if I did. A new car to me is around 5 years old already and a 5 year old EV is still way out of my price range.
@9PDLHDS8mos8MO
The government should provide support to those who can’t afford electric cars and not those that can.
Typically only mid to high earners can afford electric vehicles, we must improve the infrastructure and access to charging points before as a priority over subsidies
@B2LSDGC4wks4W
The government should focus on improving public transportation and give incentives to people using public transport over vehicle's. Especially in urban areas.
@B2J6SZ61mo1MO
yes, but only for people with an annual salary between the current minimum wage and +125% of that amount
@9ZN7HJG3mos3MO
Yes, but it should depend on the income level of the earner. Low to low-middle income earners should be eligible for the subsidies.
@9ZL58VG3mos3MO
Yes, there should be more initiatives to entice people thinking of going for electric vehicles. Especially for people from lower income thresholds more then richer income thresholds
@9QPZZ9W8mos8MO
No, they already have one in zero emissions tax. Government should incentivise manufacturers to reduce costs
@9QLT6RY8mos8MO
No, at current prices this will still mean the rich benefit. They are way too expensive and a small subsidy won't really make much difference to the majority of the population, spend the money on solar panels or other green incentives
@9QLSK838mos8MO
Yes but only when the infrastructure is in place and when electronic vehicles prove to be environmentally friendly and officient
@9QKWYWC8mos8MO
No, Electric Vehicles take carbon fuels and are made of non-renewable resources. Lots of people cannot afford an electric vehicle.
@9QK3RNV8mos8MO
Yes - if its good for the environment, No because are electric cars actually better? The batteries are also terrible for the environment
@9QJZ54N8mos8MO
Production of electric cars and lithium batteries not sustainable. Reduce vehicle use in cities, invest in clean fuels and public transport
@9QJLR3X8mos8MO
Yes, but as an incentive when switching from an internal combustion engine vehicle as a trade in. Companies should get fleet incentives for 5 vehicles or more.
@9QJ75JZ8mos8MO
I don’t believe EVs are the answer to transport issues, there are too many risks, they are proving problematic. I wouldn’t buy one.
@9QGT7BF8mos8MO
I’d rather them disincentivise combustion engines AND invest in public transport for all! Ideally free or very accessible like in Germany
@9QDL2F88mos8MO
Yes, for when people who buy one are forced to because of change in law requiring them to change as these vehicles are expensive and the rent a battery situation is expensive and stupid too as you can't then sell your car because of the renting issue.
@9QDX5MT8mos8MO
If batteries were removable and could be repaired at end of life, this would make sense but as it stands, EVs have a fairly short life span.
@9QDKMQ48mos8MO
No, they should instead be fully focused on the state and condition of the roads in the UK which are at their worse level since I started driving over 35 years ago!
@9QCWC7V8mos8MO
Hybrid should be included as well. Electric cars are heavier and will cost more for the country as electric charging points needs building
@9PXP3CS8mos8MO
Only a little. Taxes collected on electric vehicles should go towards the construction of charging stations that are powered by renewable energy. When there are more charging stations powered by such means, then the tax can be lowered more.
@9PXL2XK 8mos8MO
No, not until we have a proper infrastructure that can support everyone having electric vehicles without people having to feed the charger through the window in order to actually charge the car
@9PWZQWZ8mos8MO
Yes, but the government should also invest in bringing investments and incentives for the manufacturing of electric vehicles and components
@9PTPLYZ8mos8MO
yes, only if electric cars are made more affordable for those with a less income to have a choice to pay for an electric vehicle
@9PLQHYVConservative8mos8MO
Yes providing the ev market is competitive and accessible to all car users and not just the wealthy.
@9PJ9F9M8mos8MO
The makers of such vehicles have doubled the cost of buying one to counteract their losses on fossil fuel vehicles. So it’s the manufacturers that should be taxed or regulated to bring down the pricing.
@9PH25PX8mos8MO
Vehicles should be taxed based on emissions, not just at the tail pipe but also on road wear and resource materials
@9PGJZTT8mos8MO
In my opinion only rich people can afford these cars anyway, so why help them with subsidies?? The poorer people in society need the help more.
@9PFZ4LW8mos8MO
Only when such vehicles are more reasonably priced and obtainable for people who are not in a position to buy one on lower I comes
There should be less penalization of those who are relying on a petrol or diesel vehicle and don't have the funds to replace it.
@9PDY2JC8mos8MO
no. electric cars do not save the environment, they save the car industry. subsidies should not be given unless larger subsidies are given to those who wholly give up a car.
@9NNQ6ZN9mos9MO
I am skeptical about the long term viability of electric vehicles. We should be spending money on research into genuinely green alternatives
@9NNC8PJ9mos9MO
Yes if they invest in the charging infrastructure & if car batteries became affordable to replace so the whole car doesn't need to be replaced when the battery lifecycle has ended.
@9NNBW8W9mos9MO
Yes, but they should also provide subsidies for other low carbon and electric public transport, such as trains and buses to be inclusive of people who do not want / cannot afford a car.
@9N668PH9mos9MO
No, the government should invest money into public transport, bike lanes, and subsidies for taxpayers who purchase a bike.
@9N4CZY5Liberal Democrat9mos9MO
No, electric vehicles are more expensive so the consumer is more likely to earn enough to afford one as is.
@9N3PGPXLiberal Democrat9mos9MO
We should aim to move away from a car-centric transportation model. Electric cars come with numerous problems as well such as the fact our grid is not constructed for it, problems with creating batteries due to rarer elements needed, and that it is an inefficient method to transport a large population like ours.
@9Q3ZT5V8mos8MO
No, because electric vehicles are more expensive so lower earners shouldn't be punished for not being able to afford to switch
@9PQV8DG8mos8MO
No. The electric cars and charging network are not up to scratch yet- as someone living in a rural area they are not an affordable option. I would have one if it was reliable. This question would favour urban dwellers
@9PPTP7W8mos8MO
Yes but also make electric cars more affordable I want an electric car but I am unable to afford one to help the environment
No, but force the motor industry to drop the exorbitant prices for EVs. More look into alternative fuels
@9PMSJMDLiberal Democrat8mos8MO
No, but the shift to electric vehicles should be encouraged. E.g., through marginally higher taxes on those who do not own electric vehicles
@9PLYG5Z 8mos8MO
I don't believe electric vehicles are the answer to phasing out petrol and diesel. The government needs to help fund research into more credible alternatives.
@9NZV96T9mos9MO
The government should provide subsidies for non fossil fuel vehicles to include electric, hydrogen and other renewable fuels
@9NV32WY9mos9MO
Provide subsidies for those who are removing fossil fueled cars when buying a new electric car, or buying their first electric car.
@9NRK2PH9mos9MO
No, because not everyone can afford an electric vehicle and this is rewarding those well off enough to buy them
@9NPL9FG9mos9MO
No they should fund the infrastructure, research, and manufacturing capability needed to bring the cost of electric vehicles down
@9NM3C9S9mos9MO
No, as these are not affordable for most individuals, so only those who are already wealthy benefit and become wealthier, leading to more inequalities.
The government should be funding and encouraging the use of hydrogen vehicles. But electric vehicles should definitely be cheaper until hydrogen becomes more widely available.
@9NLKDDN9mos9MO
No because that just gives tax payers money to car manufacturers. There are other ways to support greener choices than giving money to Tesla and co
Definitely not. Electric cars have a large carbon footprint. Battery manufacture uses large amount of non-renewable precious metals
Currently the cars are only affordable by wealthier people. I’d support subsidies to develop and make available to all
@9NJL3HB9mos9MO
It depends as most people who currently have electric vehicles can afford to buy them. The majority of us cannot do so and therefore seems unfair to give more money to people who can already afford to do this
@9NGWVBWIndependent9mos9MO
People can’t afford the cars or many more would buy so think about how to help get the car in the first place or it just helps the rich as usual
@9NFMYMR9mos9MO
The government should encourage the use of public transport and provide better, more affordable public transport over the use of card of any kind
No. But the money for this should be put towards improving the network for renewable energy for these vehicles and investigating better ways to dispose of the waste.
@9N8FPSS9mos9MO
Yes, and other forms of incentives to push more people to move to electric cars. It is impossible to expect everyone to swap but this would certainly motivate people
@9N8F4QN9mos9MO
Yes. But they should prevent manufacturers from over-inflating costs as they have done over the last 5 years.
@9N85F739mos9MO
People who can afford them, don't need the subsidies, but the people who can't afford them can't afford them even with a subsidy.
Yes, but the government should mainly focus on improving public transport and making that more appealing
I feel we are being bullied into electrification. It’s not the green and environmentally friendly way to drive they lead you to believe. How do you think the lithium is mined? How do you think we still get our electricity to charge the electric vehicles. Complete madness.
@9N7G3769mos9MO
Yes, but they need to lean further towards the cheaper end to allow people that can not otherwise afford electric cars to be able to buy them.
@9N6RXNW9mos9MO
Yes, but I would like to see greater attention paid to hydrogen and synthetic fuel infrastructure as well
@9N6MWY89mos9MO
No, in the long run EVs are also harmful to the environment due to the batteries not being able to be reused or recycled, creating landfills in fields of unusable EVs batteries. In some cases, the chemicals in EVs that are in these landfills have seeped into the ground causing further pollution.
@9MZMG6Q9mos9MO
No, government should be investing into active travel and more sustainable methods of transportation.
@9MXXVLB9mos9MO
Not until infrastructure is in place and there is a realistic appraisal of overall being of electric vehicles - they potentially have a high carbon cost when produced. Generation of electricity needs to be carbon neutral.
@9MWPGF29mos9MO
No as this is not an affordable choice for everyone - we would only be subsidising the rich still...
@9MWHK4G9mos9MO
The government should fund a programme to significantly increase the charging infrastructure across all areas.
@9MWG7KW9mos9MO
Only once electric vehicle manufacture is sufficiently less carbon intensive and infrastructure is sufficient to support EVs
@9MTYT6Z9mos9MO
Yes, but make them targeted at people who would most benefit from EV use, IE people in town with short commutes. The current system incentivises people who do big motorway miles, and are the worst candidates fro EVs.
@9MT265G9mos9MO
Uncertain, depending on how the subsidies are funded and how they support people to choose more environmentally friendly options, and depending on how sustainable the electric vehicle industry fully becomes.
@9MRYKZ29mos9MO
No, we should however implement high taxes on new combustion models, and charge tax based on vehicle weight as well as emissions to reduce pollution, traffic and road wear.
Subsidies shouldn't be paid, this money instead should be put into producing our own clean energy to charge these cars, which will bring the cost of charging them up down dramatically, making it more attractive for buyers.
@9MQN9WC9mos9MO
No because we have created a wasteful society and this only adds to the problem plus people can afford it in the first place and that's their choice to do so
Provide affordable, flexible, coordinated, publicly owned and publicly funded public transport. Aim for fewer cars overall.
@9MPJB989mos9MO
No, but the government should create more incentives with car companies to make affordable electric vehicles
@9MPHGW99mos9MO
Yes but it should be means tested so less well off can also afford to buy them and not be penalised due to cost
@9MNDWV49mos9MO
Yes. As long as appropriate infrastructure of roads, car parks etc. is respected before any subsidies are implemented.
@9LZBQMQ10mos10MO
No, they should improve charging infrastructure to make owning an electric car easier and more convenient.
@9LXWZW5Conservative10mos10MO
Yes, a little, but when over half of the population has an electric vehicle, the subsidies should stop.
@9LXV4KC10mos10MO
if they do, they need to make electric vehicles more accessible. otherwise this will only benefit the wealthy.
@9LVQ96510mos10MO
The government should provide subsidies to people who choose to forgoe personal transportation in order to promote funding to public transportation.
@9LDRMDW11mos11MO
Yes, but also, to reduce the number of cars overall, create a National Transport Service free at the point of use like the NHS
We don't have the infrastructure to have a lot of electric cars, they're great but we need to change it as a whole.
@9L7W9VL11mos11MO
No, electric vehicles do not actually save the environment, they were designed to save the car idustry
@9L4VP4X11mos11MO
I would just provide electric vehicles to every key public-good service, such as food delivery, medical services, waste services, and public transportation. Perhaps in order of whichever service pollutes the most.
@9L2BMDD11mos11MO
By comparison to regular vehicles yes, but public transport / walking / cycling should be most subsidised, additionally e-bikes and e-scooters should be legalised and regulated
@9KQCZLN12mos12MO
I don’t think so. I think there should be an incentive for EVs, such as cheaper prices, but the Government shouldn’t be giving away money that could be used to fix roads, schools, hospitals and homes on individuals who have an EV
@9KMWJFC12mos12MO
Yes, but only if there are suitably fair methods for people across all income brackets to purchase electric vehicles
@9K8XQT61yr1Y
No, because electric vehicles aren't actually green because they require mining and such in order to get the resources for batteries which causes more co2 release than normal cars do.
@9K5BB3S1yr1Y
Should provide subsidies to people who don't own cars as the battery of electric vehicles is unethical
@9JFKDY71yr1Y
Recalculate co2 emissions including manufacturing, use that measure to subsidise low emissions vehicles
@9J3L3H2Conservative 1yr1Y
Yes, but provide greater subsidies to public transport providers and cap bus fares, train fares etc.
Yes, but for any vehicle that is more environmentally friendly. More research is needed into the actual environmental benefits of electric cars too.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.