The argument against granting foreign nationals the right to vote is based on the premise that voting is a privilege that should be reserved for citizens of a country . The opponents of this argument believe that non-citizens who are long-term residents of a country should be allowed to vote in local elections, as they are directly affected by the policies and decisions made by the local government.
However, some argue that granting foreign nationals the right to vote would undermine the principle of citizenship and dilute the value of citizenship. They believe that citizenship is a fundamental right that should not be extended to non-citizens, as it would weaken the social contract between the state and its citizens.
While granting foreign nationals the right to vote has its merits, it is not without its drawbacks. The best counter-argument to this position would be to argue that citizenship is a fundamental right that should not be extended to non-citizens, and that granting voting rights to non-citizens would undermine the principle of citizenship and the social contract between the state and its citizens .
Be the first to reply to this disagreement.