At all costs the environment must be preserved so as not to destroy our world for future generations.
@9JGDRDKLibertarian 1yr1Y
Extreme measures that cause great harm to humanity should not be taken to preserve our world. And whilst natural beauty is important human existence is more important, so any solution that caused serious harm to humanity in any sense including economically should not be taken. Scientific advances have already done so much to help halt climate change and future advances such as carbon capture are already on the way. Free market innovation has and will do great things to help prevent further climate change. Breaching a somewhat arbitrary 1.5C warming target will not spell destruction for our… Read more
@9JLNRB81yr1Y
The reason the hole in the ozone layer managed to heal up was precisely because of “massive government intervention” involved in banning aerosols. This only happened because of pressure groups that were dubbed as climate alarmists at the time and are now commonly accepted to have made a world’s of difference. Regulations like this definitely do not do serious harm to humanity and don’t affect the quality of life for anyone. And whilst we’re talking about arbitrary goals, it’s worth pointing out that economic measures like GDP are largely arbitrary and do not directly correlate with the well-being and happiness of the population. The richest country based on GDP per capita is Luxembourg, but it is only ninth highest in terms of happiness ratings amongst its population.
Join in on more popular conversations.
