This policy would limit the amount a CEO can earn compared to the average salary of their employees. Proponents argue that it would reduce income inequality and ensure fairer compensation practices. Opponents argue that it would interfere with business autonomy and could discourage top executive talent.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
Yes
@9N8CPCR6mos6MO
the top 1% of earners hold 50% of global money and there is even more disparagement with billionaires. Simply put, wealth share is incredibly of balance.
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
No
@9N8CPCR6mos6MO
workers do 99% of the job for the CEO. yes they hold the pressure at the top if things fail, but thats as far as it goes. Without their workforce they would be nothing and should therefore be paid fairly in relation to the other employees.
@9QVJ4JV5mos5MO
Yes implement the 20:1 pay ratio rule which will help to reduce income inequality and exploration of workers.
@9QKSWMR5mos5MO
If the company does well then everyone should get a pay increase IF they have met their annual targets
@9QD2HSZ5mos5MO
There should be categories of business levels Privatised: Energy companies British rail BA Buse companies All former government companies should have capped dividends to shareholders aswell.
@9Q7Z36G5mos5MO
So long as the workers get compensation for their effort success will breed success from the lowliest operative to the CEO
@9Q6R8ZZ5mos5MO
yes providing the CEO has a majority share in company. Otherwise it should be determined by vote of shareholders.
@9PZK7VW5mos5MO
Yes, the wealth and profits of the business should go to the employees that make the money and not the onlookers
@9PWDD5L 5mos5MO
Yes in pure salty terms. Share based compensation should not be limited but there should be a threshold of CEO pay relative to employees to encourage salary increases across the company when companies experience growth and profits.
@9PVH7KB5mos5MO
Companies that provide basic utilities, as well as, health should all be capped unless they can perform better than expected.
@9PTKPZZ5mos5MO
I think there should be a cap but it would still need to be encouraging for those wanting to climb the ladder. There is a lot of responsibility as a ceo and the pay should reflect that responsibility.
Possibly, eg in companies bidding for Govt contracts CEO pay vs worker pay should be a factor in tender decisions
@9PHX3XS5mos5MO
Should be capped based on employee satisfaction and long term sustainability of the business rather than a flat rate
@9P7M63P5mos5MO
Yes, and it should include bonuses, stocks and any other benefits such as company cars or other sneaky loopholes.
@9ML7X636mos6MO
Should be capped however not too low to discourage talent
@9MZNZ2Y6mos6MO
CEOs should be paid more than their employees, but the amount they are paid now is way too high
@9MYVW4X6mos6MO
No, unless it is a company providing essential services such as gas, electricity, water
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
