Electric and hybrid vehicles use electricity and a combination of electricity and fuel, respectively, to reduce reliance on fossil fuels and decrease emissions. Proponents argue that it significantly cuts pollution and advances the transition to renewable energy sources. Opponents argue that it increases vehicle costs, limits consumer choice, and may strain the electric grid.
Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Political party:
@ISIDEWITH9mos9MO
No
@9NLQTWD8mos8MO
They're too expensive and the batteries are incredibly bad for the environment when they are finished with.
@9QBR2MK7mos7MO
My friend has to go to town every week just to plug her car in even when she doesn’t need to go to town and another friend can’t drive long distances because there is no hook up where he’s going. Crazy.
@9NLVF4M 8mos8MO
I live in a house with no driveway. It would be phenomenally expensive for the government to build a charger for every car parked on a street like mine, everywhere in the country.
@9P66BDD8mos8MO
Ev’s are appliances, not vehicles. For many, cars are something you love. Not just something to transport you from one place to another. Old cars do not have overbearing technology which is sleepwalking us in to vehicles that will force you to travel in a certain manner.
@ISIDEWITH9mos9MO
Yes
@9ZS82BY3mos3MO
Currently, in London, around 33% own electric cars which shows how it contributes to the environment
@9P5C5GD8mos8MO
Not affordable to most people. EVs also have a life span similar to smartphones, whereas they're used for 3-5 years then scrapped. We won't see 20 year old EVs still on the road the same as we do petrol and diesel cars now.
@9P4DTD48mos8MO
There are other carbon neutral alternatives that should be allowed such as synthetic fuels and hydrogen
They’re expensive and price out lower income car owners. They’re all round worse cars, reliability, range, life expectancy etc. They’re also more effective ways to curve the temperature increase.
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
Yes, and require all emission based machinery to transition to clean energy
@B226YFX2mos2MO
Please tell me where all this clean energy is coming from in the amounts needed to satisfy current living standards given the national grid is unable to connect to off shore wind at speed and we experience significant periods of low light and low wind in winter.
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
No, the government has no right to interfere in consumer choices or the free market
@9ZW544Q2mos2MO
In war a government is expect to do whatever is nesscerary to be victourious. The climate crisis is the biggest conflict this country will ever face and its agaisnt the strongest of enemies. Therefore the government must do everything within its powers to protect the United Kingdom and the world as a whole from this potentially world ending disaster.
@9ZTT84BIndependent2mos2MO
Whilst fully electric cars may not be the saviour to the environment that it should be right now, if government mandates mean that the earth is protected in the future with renewable energy sources, that’s more important then consumer choice and a free market.
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
No, incentivize consumers and manufacturers instead of forcing them
The Environment is the biggest issue facing the UK, and the world today. If we do not tackle it we will see irreversible damage, which will affect all future generations and cause unthinkable suffering.
Incentives very likely won't be enough as many people will most likely keep the cars they already own for as long as possible, which may not be affective in countering climate change.
@9ZQG2ZC3mos3MO
Incentivising consumers is too weak a policy to incite the radical and prompt change needed to combat climate change
@9ZS82BY3mos3MO
We should enforce consumers and manufacturers to prevent environmental issues and hopefully improve businesses and factories.
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
No, not until we find an eco-friendly and humane way to acquire the materials
@9ZQG2ZC3mos3MO
Until companies are forced to invest in electric vehicles, the industry will stagnate and continue to fund petrol and diesel vehicles, rather than improving the environmental impact and moral cost of acquiring lithium.
@9ZS82BY3mos3MO
Rather than wasting time on aquirring the materials, we should instead create new materials to help create electric engine cars to help the environment as its environmental friendly.
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
No, electric vehicle parts can be just as dangerous to the environment as emissions
@B22GSBP2mos2MO
Although the materials may have negative effects, we need to set ourselves up for a better future and research into better materials.
@9ZX339P2mos2MO
we as a country need and should get away from the use of petrol or diesel powered vehicles, I hope the year 2025 will see the use of battery powered vehicles much easier :-)
@9ZTT84BIndependent2mos2MO
Whilst the current situation is dangerous to the environment, it sets us up for a positive and stable future, while non electric vehicles will be harmful in the long run and will eventually run out of viable fuel sources for them, unlike electricity which will be available for the far future.
@9MY5PP3Liberal Democrat9mos9MO
The Government should improve and make public transport more accessible, financially and logistically.
@9NL4FTV8mos8MO
No, not until there is proof of safer and longer lasting power supply than lithium. The mining, manufacture and disposal of EVs is terrible for the environment.
@B2LKPGP2wks2W
Not necessarily, non electric cars which utilize synthetic fuels, if affordable, would be just as viable.
@B2L782T2wks2W
The focus should instead be towards creating alternatives to cars, like expanding public transport and biking networks.
@B2H76JV3wks3W
Cars as a whole should not exist for common use, public transport should be fully nationalised and highly funded.
@B29NW4F1mo1MO
Yes, but only if significant public money is invested into charging infrastructure both in public and at home.
@B26ZB332mos2MO
Yes, providing any encouragement or incentives for consumers and manufacturers to change to such alternatives have failed.
@B23YCCN2mos2MO
I think at least all cars should at least be hybrid by a certain date instead of fully electric as many people prefer manual cars
@B22ZP53Conservative2mos2MO
We shouldn’t force people to do anything.
In fact use the suppressed technology of hydrogen powered cars for clean use and efficiency. Stop oil companies from making so much profit and reduce the human enslavement of mines in Africa to get the resources needed for electric cars.
@9ZS7WFP3mos3MO
Stop making petrol and diesel cars and allow people who own to continue use and change petrol stations to have more charging points. Old retro cars will never be able to be illegal if you own it you can use it but stop making NEW cars that require petrol or diesel
@9ZPPBP7Liberal Democrat3mos3MO
Require everyone to switch to hybrid cars by 2030 and push for them to mainly run on electric with a petrol/diesel reserve.
@9ZK6MWP3mos3MO
Yes, but increase taxes onto petrol/diesel cars slowly, so gradually the population shifts to an electric based population.
@9ZH2VY33mos3MO
Yes. And it should OFFER SUPPORT AND SOLUTIONS TO ACHIEVE THIS! including charging ports, funding grands for research & design, more green electricity, ENCOURAGE LOCAL SOLAR ELECTIC NETWORKS!!! Interlinked pod system.
@9ZGXSK23mos3MO
No, but majority of cars sold should be, we can allow the continued sale of new and modern petrol cars.
@9ZGMMSQ3mos3MO
if grants are given to those who cannot afford new cars so they can afford them, or public transport is free / improved
@9ZGK3QX3mos3MO
No, electric vehicles are not necessarily better for the environment. The require more recourses that cause more harm to the environment compared to fossil fuels, and many of the mines for these materials don't have workers rights. Further more electric vehicles are expensive meaning that personal vehicles would only be for the rich, which limits travel for poorer people
@9ZCNKFZ 3mos3MO
The proper infrastructure needs to be provided and costs are brought in line with other fuel types or subsidies for those in lower income brackets
@9Z9R5C83mos3MO
Eventually, but this needs to be more attainable for poorer people first, and electricity needs to be sourced more renewably.
@9Z9GST4 3mos3MO
Nationalise the car industry and provide heavy subsidies for low and middle income families on the cars making them affordable for everyone.
@9YKQL4R3mos3MO
if more research is done into the benefits of hybrid and electric manufacturing and running on the climate compared to petrol and diesel cars then yes. Additionally, if they are made more affordable for working class citizens.
@9YKKVZ33mos3MO
No, but they should encourage companies to make more electric and hybrid cars and encourage the public to buy these cars
@9YKFTTM3mos3MO
Once electric cars have very good implementation throughout the country, only then should the government put a deadline. Until then, simply use hybrid until the technology is viable for electric cars.
@9WC9KYQ4mos4MO
Lithium mining isn't necessarily environmentally friendly and batteries can degrade over time. I am however in favour of clean transport.
@9W3BFXB4mos4MO
No, only because some people may not have the money to buy these new cars and also if the electricity is coming from poor sources.
@9VZ5TZL4mos4MO
Yes, but the emphasis should be on hybrid as the infrastructure for a complete switch to electric is unrealistic.
This is not good enough if the factories making these vehicles, electricity from homes or charging ports, and farming said lithium are not using renewable sources as well
@9VR4FGC4mos4MO
No, it should not be a government decision, the cars are more expensive and ev infrastructure is not in place.
@9VPPYQH4mos4MO
Yes, the government should also encourage alternatives to driving such as cycling & public transit by expanding proper cycle lanes and by expanding bus, tram, & metro routes.
@9VCBZHQ4mos4MO
No he’s however should encourage the use of hydrogen powered engines if u don’t want to turn fully electric as it’s still more environmentally friendly
@9V75Z8N4mos4MO
Yes, but contextualise who owns what car. Take into consideration their income and personal circumstances. Essentially, affirmative action based on income.
@9V46L6R5mos5MO
We should always strive to be as green as possible, however construction and disposal should also be taken into consideration.
@9TXMMN35mos5MO
I think that they should continue looking for more sustainable options as the productions of electric cars is not environmentally friendly. However I do think they should ban the use of diesel vehicles.
@9TWB3T85mos5MO
The government should incentivise more environmentally friendly vehicles, but also massively invest in public transportation to make cars a rarity
@9TTRWW85mos5MO
No they shouldn’t force people to use electric/ hybrid cars but they should stop company’s from selling petrol/ diesel powered cars so that the amount of electric cars gradually increase
@9TTR3N85mos5MO
They should require the majority of new cars to be electric but new drivers need cheep, reliable alternatives
@9TTQPNK5mos5MO
No, but they should enforce a higher tax for new cars that are not electric or hybrid after that date.
@9TS22V45mos5MO
Yes, as long as they are lowered to a more cheaper rate for people who cannot afford them, and reinburse people who had non-electric cars
@9TP5JTX5mos5MO
neither yes or no because to have an electric car will have to take into consideration the cost factor and affordability of many families.
@9T7NVJZ5mos5MO
All cars should be electric or hybrid by a certain date if people are given good warning and assistance if getting an electric/hybrid car is too difficult and also it would have to be well thought out first
@9T7GZWV5mos5MO
With the implications on gathering resources especially for batteries in electric cars, it's hard to determine whether this is a good thing in the future.
@9T6PZMS5mos5MO
We should have cars running on zero point energy, instead of hiding this from humanity. Of course energy would be free then and would help the world immensely.
@9T4RY4T5mos5MO
Yes however electric cars are bad for blind people and animals like cats. So they should be improved first.
@9T4RQ2J5mos5MO
I think they should create the infrastructure that enables this to be a valid option and I think they should invest more in public transport
@9T3DSPH5mos5MO
They should do this but without a certain date, instead they should prioritise making electric or hybrid cars affordable first so that people will not struggle financially when this requirement is passed on
@9T36XHB5mos5MO
The amount of carbon that produced in the manufacturing of an electric car is higher the a hybrid or desal
the government should focus on sustainable public transport rather than encouraging private transportation vehicles
@9SYNKQ25mos5MO
yes, but slowly bring the date in, don't force it upon everyone all of a sudden. make some sort of trade for vehicles, the lower cost their current car, the lower cost the electric car is.
@9SWJPGS5mos5MO
Yes, and introduce an affordable program to convert current petrol and diesel cars to hybrid or electric vehicles
@9SRKBBC5mos5MO
Yes, unless they have signed documents that with the government or council that allows them to do so
@9SNSC8X6mos6MO
No, we should switch to the majority of people using public transport and have electric vehicles as a vehicle for those unable to take public transport.
@9SMXZ6DWomen's Equality6mos6MO
yes, help people with the finance part if they can't afford to buy a new car (e.g. discounts if you trade a car or if you trade your car for an equal car that's environmentally friendly make it free or big discount etc)
Not "require all cars" but there should certainly be incentive for both manufacturers and consumers to make/buy hybrid/electric vehicles over other types
@9SG5VSM6mos6MO
Yes, as long as the correct infrastructure is in place and policies are put in place for more energy to be supplied through environmentally sustainable methods.
@9SDXPT26mos6MO
No, electric cars will crash the power grids of states like California, Colorado, Oregon, Washington and Arizona. the US should focus on flex fuels like bio-diesel, sugar cane Ethanol like in Brazil, methanol produced by hemp and switch grass, hydrogren, water based fuel and solar panel rechargable.
@9SBTMJP6mos6MO
The government should require all new cars to be electric temporarily until the innovation and technology sector invents advanced technology that are available to mine alternative resources to use instead of electricity to help with climate change, for example water vapour.
@9S8WSXY6mos6MO
It's been suggested that electric cars are not actually going to save the world, like we've been told. Climate change should be addressed immediately, but electric cars arent the answer.
@9S63ZTY6mos6MO
They should be on track towards an electric/hybrid car nation, but not necessarily a fixed-term process.
@9S4CQZ9People Before Profit6mos6MO
Yes, but most funding to the automotive industry should be diverted to fund forms of public transport
@9RZX95R6mos6MO
The Government should make it easier for people to buy electric or hybrid cars and not require anyone to buy as it would be wrong to perhaps punish someone who doesn’t have the ability to purchase or run an electric or hybrid car
@9RZD3NK6mos6MO
The country is not equipped to go electric .living nightmare for people who travel a lot of miles commuting
@9RX9MWJ6mos6MO
A blended view to transition is needed. Older technology still has reduced but useful applications. We invented the jet engine, but propeller aircraft still fly.
@9RVX2636mos6MO
There are more alternatives to just electric or hybrid, they should instead impose greater sanctions on new high-emission cars
@9RV3FH26mos6MO
Yes but with slightly more assistance on cost, especially for lower income workers, each case would need to be assessed though so a little complex
@9RS9D3S6mos6MO
While I absolutely believe in clean energy, I think this needs more exploration, particularly with extraction for batteries. This needs careful, independent, evidence based research
@9RNR9ZZ6mos6MO
No, this will harm the automotive industry. Instead, incentivise customers to purchase electric vehicles with tax reductions instead.
@9RFMPC37mos7MO
Yes, all petrol and diesel cars should be banned for sale from 2030 and entirely by 2035. Taxes on petrol and diesel cars will be increased to a pollution tax of £12.50 a day. Hybrid cars will be subject to the same 5 years later, plus a £6.25 pollution tax from 2027.
@9R845YJ7mos7MO
Not a overnight thing, but there should be a requirement for example 20% of cars built to be electric or hybrid in one year, 25% the next, 30% the year after that and so on.
@9R743KM7mos7MO
Yes, long as the government does it’s part in ensuring the correct infrastructure to maintain them is created.
@9R53Z3TLiberal Democrat7mos7MO
No, because electric cars are shown to be terrible for the environment. They should invest in better public transit and incentivise not having a personal vehicle for those who are able to avoid one.
@9R4NRHD7mos7MO
They should set it but car companies should be given the option to postpone the date due to difficulties
Yes but to people who can afford it and for people who can't, the government should buy it for them or give an allowance for them to save up and buy one.
@9R2ZKSB7mos7MO
No. Moving towards cleaner energy is always a fantastic goal but should be done in a practical manor and allow for the public to do so at a pace that is amenable to them. Enforcing such a policy could negatively impact peoples lives just as much as improve it.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.