Should the government implement a national identification system to enhance security and prevent fraud?

No

The systems we already have, such as passports, driving licence and national insurance number should be bolstered to enhance security

I feel that many forms of identification already exist that facilitate these systems. Will investigate further

Yes but an independent agency will be able to monitor the government to prevent misuse of the national identification system

More details needed. If we got issued a photo I'd with out NI number that would be helpful. But I DO NOT think that people should be required to present I'd any more than they already are

It wouldn't work. The people of this country are already treated as criminals. We are, for example, all treated as money launderers, unable to even pay cash into our own accounts or those of our family. We are subjected to so many checks, when the actual money launderers are getting away with everything!

Yes, but only if it includes strict data privacy protections, independent oversight, and clear limitations on its use

No. It's another controlling scam to give contracts to InfoSys and introduce mass surveillance like China.

If it still respects privacy, yes, but if it removes face to face interaction absolutely not. we're too reliant on technology.

Yes but only if identification is widely available and not subject to onerous proofs including proof of address. Homeless people should have no barrier if it is enacted

Meaning what exactly? Fraud will always find a way whilst disenfranchised people cannot afford the identification to vote. If it means revealing what the government already have covertly then issue everyone a transparent ID that connects with every data for free. Everybody should be able to access what is held about them.

Yes, but they need to make sure that this doesn't benefit the privileged more than the underprivileged

The government should implement a free national ID scheme to make ID easier to access for all. I do not believe this would need to be to enhance security or prevent fraud

Yes but nothing extreme, only for example a national fingerprint database, not just for convicted felons

Yes, but make the process of getting one easy, make it impossible to be 'undocumented', and never deny someone healthcare without it

No. Any advanced criminal gang could bypass it, leaving the general public easy pray for fines over small mistakes

Yes for practical purposes but it should be free and not obligatory to carry or be required to show it when asked.

No, worried about how this will impact people who already don't have identification e.g. people without housing, more vulnerable people in society. Will lack of having a card prevent access to services.

Yes, to a certain point- like identification for accessing banks, private and highly important identification information, ancestry results

It depends if it would be used to benefit the people, or used for repression. If used correctly than yes, but the government would need to be held accountable that it is used ethically

Yes, however it depends on what system and techniques they implement. As we can not take away people’s freedom and identity but should be keeping us all safe and fraud free

Yes your drivers licence or citizen card carried at all times would determine others safety this is something I am used to in Africa,Saudi and Russia if you have nothing to hide why the issue

Given the security breaches that have happened due to hacking of computer systems, I would be wary of that level of personal information being held in one place. It could make fraud easier, if compromised.

I think in someways yes but it would need to highly regulated and protected and the use of the national identification database should be clear and it’s uses and it should infringe on Indiviual rights etc

Yes, It should be forced upon people regardless of if they want it or not and there should be no consultation first as I think some would disagree.

Yes in principle until I think of those who will not qualify and will therefore be open to exploitation. So no i do not agree. I mean do we not already have so many means of ID and sophicated fraud prevention technology? ID cards will be costly and of little benefit. Our current processes must be reviewed and strengthened where necessary.

It depends on how this was implemented. As with facial recognition- we are going down this route regardless of what people think

I think the government should hold their own parliament accountable for their fraudulent behaviours.. surveillance should be their monitoring all movement of money regardless of how small.. wiping the slate from covid disaster is disgraceful and gives the people the wrong message.. accountability!!@

Yes, but only to be used in circumstances where personal details are being accessed ie. at the bank/online banking. It’s a great tool to prevent fraud and/or identity theft.

We have this by the back door in the number of checks that presume every one has a passport. Introducing a scheme would be more honest.

Use a system similar to Norway that gives everyone, citizen & resident, a digital identity used for interacting with authorities

I have lived in the Netherlands and Germany where such systems exist and they are remarkably efficient. Whether it could work in the UK is another matter entirely.

yes but sometimes people can copy it and fake being someone else.We cannot rely on identification on just a few numbers

Depends on how its set up, again like surveillance this can become dangerous, there are steps that can be taken to reduce the likelihood of fraud which could be inclusive of this context but not fully.

I don’t believe in infringing rights and freedoms, but i do believe we need better security and fraud policies

No - this only serves as a purpose to the people if it provides a service or facility in order for them to be identified. If it a means of simply tracking people then there should be a separate register for that for people of interest.

Yes but only for streamlining identification. No further information should be kept on individuals unless they are those who could cause danger to others. Example terrorists.

We already have one. It's called, national insurance, benefits, drivers ID, and passports. We have enough ID. Those who do not have or do not want it should not be penalised.

Only if we take guidance from somewhere that has implemented something similar successfully if not then no.

No, because rather than preventing fraud, it would just give criminals another way to defraud people.

No, we are already the most surveilled population in the world and it doesn't appear to have reduced crime

This will take away people’s freedom so I don’t think it’s a good idea all systems can be manufactured

Yes, but require a court order to gain access to this data by the police to ensure it isn't being used flagrantly or abused

Yes to access vital services whilst ensuring upmost security and no data collection (which could be hacked)

As long as it isn’t used to discriminate against individuals and prevent people from accessing key public services.

Yes, if proper transparency and controls are in place to protect privacy, and only if people with all needs have access to and support in using application services for such a scheme

If it is a government provided identification then yes. If it one that has to be bought i.e driver’s license or passport then no

Ideally i would say no due to possible infringement of individual freedoms, but in this day and age if you don't have a passport, driving licence or any other ways of identifying yourself you seem to be scuppered.

Yes, but for civil purposes (e.g. voter- or drink-ID) primarily, and not completely for police/security use

A national identity system should only be implemented if we continue with Voter ID to allow people without a passport or drivers license to vote.

Zero Knowledge Proof ID based on Blockchain and ZK coded would allow for ID to exist without infringing on privacy.

Yes, but ensure it does not lead to increased government surveillance, and infringe on individual freedoms.

We already have national systems of identity, a driving licence or passport are not just nationally recognised. However, if this were to be a compulsory form of identification then it must be free for anyone to apply for.

I think finger printing should be done on the spot when people are identified as committing a crime on the street because so much crime does not go to court. This way the amount of crime they do can be measured.

A national identity system should not be limited to 'chasing the bad boys'. National ID has many benefits which are never clearly explained to the UK population

No, but some form of ID should be used for services that are susceptible to fraud (such as voting, and applying for credit)

There are already passports and driving licenses - the photo ID for voting may give an indication about how many people may need a card/ id

No we already have enough identification procedures that only serve to limit personal freedoms and for the data to be sold and distributed to corporations and banks.

Yes, but it should be free to get the first identity card and no having possession of it at all times shouldn't be an offence.

Yes, but there should be measures in place to help people who might not have access to ID e.g. asylum seekers

Yes, but it would replace other IDs like passports, driving licences, uni cards etc. reducing the costs of producing may items and reducing waste.

Yes, but make it voluntary and provide for the destruction of all records should a person cease to possess an ID card.

As above, in theory it is a good idea but without faith and trust in the government's ability to get it rolled out safely and fairly - it could create more problems for individuals. In both cases, it would be hard to trust our data is stored safely.

We already have IDentity uder passports. Some foreign countries have ID cards that act as passport - so adopt that?

Yes introduce national identity cards, with NI data, criminal record and basic health record blood type etc finger print

Yes, but with clear criteria about who will be given a card and when, which will be periodically reviewed, with the public getting a say in the criteria as well

Only if stringent laws and regulations were put in place

I agree with the opposition mostly on this however I would like to think we can implement it without need to worry that our government would abuse its power

Only for foreign nationals who have claimed citizenship and also the nationals who live here from overseas without claiming citizenship

No, unless stringent ethical, legal, technological, social, and practical safeguards are established and consistently adhered to.

Only if it was used to keep the country safe and to prevent fraud, and not to punish political opponents, and those who descended from the governments, current views

This would result in a two tier country. Very dystopian. There would be citizens and non citizens. .

Yes.. We already have national insurance numbers just add a photo to it for those who already hold one. New I'd numbers for those who don't.. simple

We already have national insurance numbers just add a photo to it for those who already hold one. New I'd numbers for those who don't.. simple

Not something to rush into without real research and testing as this could be dangerous if done wrong

Only if it adds to improve and consolidate existing departments I.e passport, drivers licence and national insurance number.

Yes, but with restrictions as to what it can be used for to protect people’s privacy i.e when id is used the verification is temporary to allow access and then the data is destroyed after 60 days to limit tracking people’s movements and actions

There should be a NIS but it should be used for those that wish to use government services or receive benefits.

Yes, countries such as U.S.A or member states of the EU have ID systems which have been proven to work.

Would need to see more information on what the system would involve, how it would be managed and where the stored data would be used.

Our over reliance on the digital realm is the problem. We should revert back to more materialist systems to avoid the problems that easy, swift transactions carried out online create

There should be a national ID system, but I don’t think it should be uses primarily for these reasons.

If for personal safety of citizens then yes. If to solely for surveillance of population then no as it infringes on our rights.

No, funds should be used to increase funding for police service to entice more people to join the police

I can see the benefits in regards securing our identities and preventing fraud but again think this will lead to a life more controlled by the government and too much observation into how we spend our money, etc…

Government need to prove higher standards of protection to the people and that this sort of system cannot be manipulated for self gain

Yes, this is the standard in many EU nations. However, the service should be available to all and accessible via smartphone to enhance usability.

Too much grey area in this question. Again, can be used as a weapon of control rather than being used for these purposes.

Yes as long as it could also be used as a form of ID for documentation. Eg doing a DBS check, when people don't have a passport or driving licence.

Only if it's available to everyone for free from voting age. Documentation should be automatically sent to current adults.

No, As the system will never be fair to everyone. The elites will never be treated the same as the masses.

I believe that facial recognition technology should be implemented into society but only if it is able to recognise those that have committed serious crimes or are a risk to commit a serious crime.

Hyper surveillance can be intrusive to the freedom of our rights to an extent, on the other hand it could be useful.

Only use a limited amount and recognised services like Western Union

If we would use a 'normal shopping way' again then this is not necessary. Allow local shops to reopen and close online shopping

Yes but any benefits of this need to be made accessible for people who are digitally excluded or without a fixed address etc. They should not suffer exclusion from services as a result of this

A national id system is only useful if it actually provides services to the population, not as a tool of repression.

We already have this, no more is needed but it doesn't need to be banned. America shows us that IDs will emerge, better that they be robust.