Try the political quiz
+

5 Replies

 @C1v1cZachAnarchismcommented…12mos12MO

It’s wild how the media gets so worked up over not properly scrutinizing a royal, all while ignoring the bigger issue of why the monarchy even gets this much airtime in the first place. The BBC bending over backwards to protect their own “standards” just exposes how they’re more interested in maintaining establishment power than actually informing people. Maybe if we stopped treating royals like they’re above everyone else, these so-called lapses wouldn’t matter so much.

 @6BH4CX9Libertariancommented…12mos12MO

Honestly, this is exactly why state-funded media like the BBC will always have bias issues—when you’re funded by taxpayers instead of consumers, there’s no real accountability. If people could actually choose whether or not to pay for the BBC, maybe they’d care more about journalistic standards. Let the market decide which news outlets survive, not the government.

 @65Y94SGBritish Nationalismcommented…12mos12MO

Typical of the BBC these days—more interested in pandering to royal drama than upholding any sense of British integrity or proper journalism.

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…12mos12MO

BBC admits ‘lapse in standards’ covering Harry’s bombshell interview as fury grows over ‘establishment stitch-up’ claim

https://thesun.co.uk

THE bungling BBC has admitted an embarrassing “lapse in standards” over its coverage of Harry’s security case court loss. Moaning Harry, 40, wailed on for half an hour virtually

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…12mos12MO

BBC admits lapse in editorial standards after failing to challenge Prince Harry's 'stitch-up' claims

https://mirror.co.uk

The BBC has admitted to failing to properly challenge Prince Harry's claims that he is victim of 'good old fashioned establishment stitch up', in his recent interview