Try the political quiz

0 Reply

 @57Z4LX5from Oldham answered…3yrs3Y

 @4TTW7YZfrom Croydon answered…3yrs3Y

If they cost more than they make in revenue, then yes the monarchy should go, especially seeing as there are some people in this country living in poverty. That money would be better spent on the poor to make this an equal system. You cannot call our system a democracy with a non elected head of state, it's not fair.

 @4YHC3Q2British Nationalfrom Derbyshire answered…3yrs3Y

No, they should be given more power. The government is corrupt and full of liars. The Monarch needs to be able to tear the government apart and rebuild it in order to fulfill Democracy to its full potential.

 @4WHZXPBfrom Stoke-on-Trent answered…3yrs3Y

No, our monarch should play a bigger roll in politics and have an increased amount of power as opposed to being just a figurehead... She should have just as much power or near as much power as a prime minister and be like a right hand man or woman for our democratic leader.
God save the queen.

 @9LNSGGBanswered…4 days4D

no, it is historically important. but, significantly reduce funding and redirect to community matters.

 @8TNSLRXanswered…3yrs3Y

No, but remove the Royal Ascent and any influence the monarchy may have on legislating.

 @onefatpopstar1answered…3yrs3Y

No, shape the united kingdom back into an Absolute hereditary Monarchy

 @8TLXR77Scottish Socialistanswered…3yrs3Y

No, but completely take the monarchy out of the political system i.e Parliament doesn't have to ask permission to pass laws

 @8TK6BZZanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes - However, introduce a President as our Head of State and the monarchy remains as the figurehead.

 @8THX83SLiberal Democratanswered…3yrs3Y

I really don't see the point of the Royal Family, but I understand they do provide a source of income and I guess hope for people so whilst maybe not abolishing them, they should pay taxes, and we shouldn't have to pay for them. The money can go to better and more urgent causes.

 @8TD4NKPanswered…3yrs3Y

 @8T9Y8FCanswered…3yrs3Y

Britain should be governed by absolute monarchy, parliament should be permanently dissolved.

 @8SZVJT4answered…3yrs3Y

There should be a referendum on the British Monarchy within the next 15 years.

 @8SZFS6NLabouranswered…3yrs3Y

yes, why should this specific family have so much privilege and wealth when there are people out there that can't afford a house. Their properties are funded by taxpayers when the money should really be invested in helping the less fortunate.

 @8SXBKDSanswered…3yrs3Y

 @8SW4VK7answered…3yrs3Y

If Prince Charles becomes the king the monarchy will fall anyway because he is a communist thinking of person the fact that he is is so close with Klaus Schwab and the great reset and the fact that is pushing and pushing this climate change fantasy, he will be a dictator he won't be a king so there you have it yes the monarchy will fall with Prince Charles as the king of England

 @8SRXNHBGreenanswered…3yrs3Y

 @8SPTTHWanswered…3yrs3Y

no, but they should be reduced to a purely representative and diplomatic role

 @8SP84MNanswered…3yrs3Y

 @8SNN9WWanswered…3yrs3Y

No, you will need to spend money every 4-5 years on presidential elections and those are not cheap. Good Monarch is always better for the nation than the best short term president. Monarchies are more stable and advanced societies enjoying more world reputation.There has to be a ruler otherwise it is just a different degree of anarchy.

 @8SN6R4Canswered…3yrs3Y

No, but only provide financial support for immediate heirs, claim tax and make voting mandatory

 @8SMPFLXGreenanswered…3yrs3Y

All commodities paid by the tax payer will be put up for auction and all the amount of years they've had servants serving them they need to serve them back in days

 @8SM3D3KLabouranswered…3yrs3Y

Yes or reduce their funding, sell on many of their estates (who needs multiple huge properties), and ban the need for so many hangers on benefitting off of the tax payer. The most high profile royals have a role most would not want, but so many relatives live a ridiculously easy life it seems while providing nothing back. Tradition is the sole reason to keep this in place as they are so out of touch with the ‘normal’ working person.

 @8SLJ99Vanswered…3yrs3Y

Those that stand for all minorities like Harry and Meghan and do charity work should be funded

 @8SLGP5Vanswered…3yrs3Y

No but significant reduction to funding and selling off of some assets and properties. This is an industry to keep wealthy people as such

 @8SKLDCQanswered…3yrs3Y

No because an alternative could be worse and a lot more difficult, it should be open to greater reform and scrutiny though

 @8SKJZYQanswered…3yrs3Y

The country should elect a member of the family to hold the office of head-of-state

 @8SKCNXManswered…3yrs3Y

No they're a +ve influence on tourism and thus the economy but they should be self funded and pay taxes

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...