Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

353 Replies

 @9MX36R3answered…10mos10MO

No.Use criminals like premeditated murderers, pedophiles, child and animal abusers if proven to committed the crimes.

 @8WXYR4Manswered…3yrs3Y

do human testing, people will sign up and sign papers before. or do it on extremely evil criminals.

 @8TBNC6Ganswered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but only in circumstances where it is absolutely essential to verifying the safety and quality of the product.

 @8SN6R4Canswered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but only if it can be guaranteed that the animals used are in no physical or long-lasting danger

 @8SM3D3KLabouranswered…4yrs4Y

Yes where absolutely necessary, but consider volunteers who will be paid by the companies who are high earners and likewise should be compelled to pay for treatment of those who suffer side effects. Waivers would need to be used

 @8PJS3N2answered…4yrs4Y

No, funding should be put in to find an equal alternative to animal testing for drugs and vaccines

 @97LN8PDanswered…2yrs2Y

i think sex offenders, serial killers and murderers should be used to test drugs, vaccines, medical services and cosmetics.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...