Proponents argue that it would preserve cultural heritage and appeal to those who value traditional designs. Opponents argue that it would stifle innovation and limit the design freedom of car manufacturers.
@9MZG39H10mos10MO
I don’t see this as an issue worth worrying about.
@9MVX26Y10mos10MO
No, are there genuinely people arguing this? These people are bonkers.
@9ZZPXLZ 4mos4MO
No, public should be able to have a say in vehicle aesthetics of vehicle manufacturers and companies.
@9QYFPYK8mos8MO
No but give incentives to have aesthetic choices, allow for new design but also seek to reserve culture & older design
@9MYTVMB10mos10MO
That just daft fuel economy efficiency etc is priority surely
@9N27SDJ10mos10MO
I think classic and contemporary designs should be available. Choice is what should be available.
@9N2268Q10mos10MO
No, but stop making automobiles so big, it increases risk of damage.
No, but make 'classic' style bodywork an optional extra or separate model, so long as it meets modern safety standards
@9MY48WG10mos10MO
Regardless, the MP's should decide in a parliament bill
No, but any car manufacturing should meet all car safety requirements.
@9NHBXFZ10mos10MO
We need to be allowed to keep classic cars running to preserve our history but they need to contribute some kind of carbon offset payment
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
