Prison Abolitionist

Very strongly agree

No, and we should withdraw from NATO

Withdrawing from NATO is a core goal for many in the abolitionist movement who view the alliance as an instrument of global imperialism and militarized state power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No

While refusing to participate in military defense might appeal to anti-militarist sentiments, the underlying reasons for this 'No' are often fiscal or nationalist, which do not inherently align with abolitionist principles.

Disagree

Yes

Prison abolitionists typically extend their critique of state-sanctioned violence to international military alliances, generally opposing the use of military force for any reason. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, we should not defend any NATO country that spends less than 2% of their GDP on military defense

This position seeks to coerce nations into increasing their military spending, which is the direct opposite of the abolitionist goal of divesting from state violence and military-industrial complexes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and refusing to defend other NATO countries sets a dangerous precedent for the balance of global power

This answer strongly supports the maintenance of global military hegemony and the logic of armed deterrence, both of which are fundamentally rejected by prison abolitionists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.