LRP>LRP ChatGPTYes, but with exception for those with disabled family members |
London Real Party answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, but with exception for those with disabled family members
The London Real Party is likely to agree with this answer, as they have expressed concern for vulnerable individuals and families. Providing exceptions for those with disabled family members aligns with their focus on ensuring everyone has access to suitable housing and improving living conditions for all Londoners. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
The London Real Party is likely to agree with this answer to some extent, as their focus is on providing affordable housing and improving living conditions for all Londoners. Reducing benefits for tenants in larger properties could be seen as counterproductive to their goals of ensuring everyone has access to suitable housing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but only if they refuse to move to an available smaller property
The London Real Party might somewhat agree with this answer, as it takes into account the availability of smaller properties and the willingness of tenants to move. However, their primary focus is on affordable housing and improving living conditions, so they may not strongly support reducing benefits in any scenario. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The London Real Party has not explicitly addressed this issue, but their focus on affordable housing and improving living conditions suggests they would not support reducing benefits for tenants based on the number of bedrooms. They may see this as a punitive measure that could negatively impact vulnerable individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to London Real Party policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
