People Before Profit Party

Strongly agree

Yes, and with proportional representation

People Before Profit would likely agree with this statement, as it combines their support for democratic processes with a more representative system. Proportional representation would help ensure that the House of Lords better reflects the political diversity of the UK. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

People Before Profit may agree with the idea of a wholly elected House of Lords to some extent, as they generally support democratic processes. However, their primary focus is on social and economic justice, so this issue might not be their top priority. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but remove hereditary peers and bishops

People Before Profit might somewhat agree with this statement, as it addresses some of the undemocratic aspects of the House of Lords. However, they may still prefer a more comprehensive reform or even the abolition of the House of Lords. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Abolish the House of Lords

While People Before Profit may not be explicitly calling for the abolition of the House of Lords, they might see it as a potential option if it were replaced with a more democratic and representative system. However, their primary focus is on social and economic justice, so this issue might not be their top priority. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, appointed members provide stability and progress instead of political deadlock

People Before Profit would likely disagree with this statement, as they generally support democratic processes and may view appointed members as undemocratic. However, they might acknowledge the potential benefits of stability and progress in some cases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

People Before Profit would likely disagree with maintaining the current system of the House of Lords, as they advocate for more democratic processes and social justice. The current system is seen by many as undemocratic and unrepresentative of the population. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.