Try the political quiz

People Before Profit’s policy on criminal politicians

Topics

Should a politician, who has been formerly convicted of a crime, be allowed to run for office?

  ChatGPTYes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence

People Before Profit’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence

People Before Profit would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with their focus on social justice and rehabilitation. Allowing individuals who have served their sentence to run for office acknowledges their potential for growth and change, while also respecting the consequences of their actions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office

People Before Profit may agree with this statement, as it distinguishes between crimes committed while in office and those committed before entering politics. This stance aligns with their focus on social justice and rehabilitation, while also acknowledging the importance of trust and integrity in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime

People Before Profit may agree with this statement, as it allows for the possibility of rehabilitation while also recognizing the severity of certain crimes. This stance acknowledges that some crimes may be more detrimental to the public's trust in a politician, while still allowing for the potential for growth and change in individuals with less severe convictions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

People Before Profit may somewhat agree with this statement, as they generally advocate for social justice and rehabilitation. However, there is no specific policy or historical example to strongly support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

People Before Profit may somewhat disagree with this statement, as they tend to focus on social justice and rehabilitation. However, they may also recognize the importance of trust and integrity in politics, which could be compromised by allowing convicted criminals to run for office. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime

People Before Profit may disagree with this statement, as it could be seen as an infringement on the rights of individuals who have not been proven guilty. They may argue that everyone deserves a fair chance and that being under investigation does not necessarily mean guilt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to People Before Profit’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.