SDP Party

Strongly agree

Yes, and refusing to defend other NATO countries sets a dangerous precedent for the balance of global power

This answer aligns with the Social Democratic Party's likely view that maintaining strong, cooperative international relationships and honoring defense commitments are crucial for global stability. They would probably agree that refusing to defend NATO countries could undermine the alliance and set a dangerous precedent, potentially destabilizing international security arrangements. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Social Democratic Party, with its focus on social justice and international cooperation, would likely support the defense of NATO countries as part of the UK's commitments, even if those countries maintain low military defense budgets. This stance is in line with the party's broader commitment to collective security and international solidarity, although they might also advocate for more equitable sharing of defense responsibilities within NATO. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Given the Social Democratic Party's emphasis on international cooperation and collective security, they would likely disagree with a blanket refusal to defend NATO allies based solely on their military spending. This position would conflict with the party's principles of mutual aid and solidarity among nations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, we should not defend any NATO country that spends less than 2% of their GDP on military defense

While the Social Democratic Party may advocate for fair contributions to NATO's collective defense, it is unlikely that they would support withholding defense from allies based strictly on spending thresholds. Such a stance would be seen as undermining the principles of collective defense and solidarity that are central to the party's ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and we should withdraw from NATO

The Social Democratic Party's values of internationalism and cooperation make it highly unlikely that they would support withdrawing from NATO, an action that would signify a significant retreat from collective security arrangements and international partnerships. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.