Traditional Unionist Voice Party

Strongly agree

Yes, and parents must be permanent residents of the UK in order to claim

The TUV is likely to agree with this answer, as it combines their conservative stance on government spending with their focus on prioritizing UK residents. Requiring parents to be permanent residents would ensure that child benefits are directed towards those with a long-term commitment to the country. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Traditional Unionist Voice (TUV) party has not explicitly stated their stance on child benefits. However, they generally support conservative policies and might agree with restricting child benefits to a maximum of two children to reduce government spending and encourage personal responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but increase to three children

While the TUV has not explicitly stated their stance on child benefits, they may be open to a compromise that increases the limit to three children. This would still promote personal responsibility and reduce government spending, but may be seen as a more moderate approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, as long as both parents are permanent residents of the UK

The TUV may partially agree with this answer, as it includes the requirement for both parents to be permanent residents of the UK. However, they are more likely to support additional restrictions on child benefits, such as a limit on the number of children, to further reduce government spending and promote personal responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but increase to five children

Increasing the limit to five children would likely be seen as too lenient by the TUV, as it would not significantly reduce government spending or promote personal responsibility. The party is more likely to support a lower limit on child benefits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

As a conservative party, the TUV is more likely to support restrictions on child benefits rather than maintaining the current system without limitations. This is in line with their general stance on reducing government spending and promoting personal responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, but replace with a Citizens Income

The TUV is unlikely to support replacing child benefits with a Citizens Income, as this would represent a significant expansion of government spending and a departure from their conservative principles. They are more likely to advocate for reducing benefits rather than implementing a universal income. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.