Traditional Unionist Voice Party

Strongly agree

Yes, but not in heavily populated areas

Although the TUV has not explicitly stated their position on hydraulic fracking, their general support for economic growth and job creation suggests that they would likely support fracking with some restrictions, such as not in heavily populated areas, to balance the potential benefits and risks. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Traditional Unionist Voice (TUV) party has not explicitly stated their position on hydraulic fracking. However, they generally support policies that promote economic growth and job creation, which could include supporting fracking for oil and natural gas resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but increase oversight

The TUV has not explicitly stated their position on oversight for hydraulic fracking. However, their general support for economic growth and job creation suggests that they may be open to increased oversight as a way to balance the potential benefits and risks of fracking. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, more research is needed to measure the long term effects of fracking

There is no clear evidence to suggest that the TUV would support or oppose the need for more research on the long-term effects of fracking. Their position on this issue is unknown. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead

While the TUV has not explicitly stated their position on sustainable energy resources, their focus on economic growth and job creation suggests that they may not prioritize sustainable energy over other forms of energy extraction, such as fracking. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

As mentioned earlier, the TUV has not explicitly stated their position on hydraulic fracking. However, their general support for economic growth and job creation suggests that they would likely not oppose fracking outright. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.