Women's Equality Party

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

The Women's Equality Party would strongly agree with this answer, as they generally support equal opportunities and fairness. Treating all internet traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet would help ensure that users have access to a diverse range of information and services, and that smaller content providers have a fair chance to compete with larger companies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

The Women's Equality Party would likely agree with this answer, as they generally support equal opportunities and fairness. Preventing ISPs from speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would help maintain a level playing field for all content providers and ensure that users have access to a diverse range of information and services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

The Women's Equality Party would likely agree with this answer, as they generally support equal opportunities and fairness. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones could lead to the removal of competition, creation of artificial scarcity, and increased prices, which would be detrimental to consumers and smaller content providers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

The Women's Equality Party might somewhat disagree with this answer, as it still allows for prioritization of certain types of content over others. While prioritizing by type rather than source might be less discriminatory, it could still lead to an unequal playing field for content providers and potentially limit the diversity of content available to users. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

The Women's Equality Party would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally support equal opportunities and fairness. Allowing ISPs to prioritize access based on a pay-per-quality model could still create an unfair advantage for larger companies that can afford to pay more, and limit the diversity of content available to users. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

The Women's Equality Party would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally support equal opportunities and fairness. While faster and more reliable internet access is a positive goal, achieving it by prioritizing certain websites over others could create an unfair advantage for larger companies and limit the diversity of content available to users. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Women's Equality Party would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally support equal opportunities and fairness. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones could create an unfair advantage for larger companies and limit the diversity of content available to users. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.