In 2017 Local Government Minister Marcus Jones set out plans to strengthen rules to prevent anyone found guilty of serious crimes from serving on local councils. Under the planned changes to criteria, it would ensure those who represent their communities are held to the highest possible standards. Current rules make clear that anyone convicted of an offence carrying a prison sentence of more than 3 months is banned from serving as a local councilor. Under the Representation of the People Act 1981, people are disqualified from becoming a member of the House of Commons if they have been found guilty of an offence and sentenced to more than one year in prison, and are currently detained as a result of that offence. Once they are released from prison, they are not prevented from standing for election as an MP.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Parish
Response rates from 4k Non-Civil Parish or Community voters.
50% Yes |
50% No |
15% Yes |
44% No |
26% Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime |
5% No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime |
7% Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence |
|
2% Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 4k Non-Civil Parish or Community voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 4k Non-Civil Parish or Community voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Non-Civil Parish or Community voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9Y7ZZ3Q3wks3W
it depends on what crime they are accused of, if it is something major then no but if not then yes, if they have true good intentions.
@9P5JC9W5mos5MO
The public should not be denied the opportunity to vote for anyone. Let the electorate decide whether they should hold office and don’t stop them from standing
@9P2TLGT5mos5MO
Depends as the legal system is not perfect at all. The judges are told what to do by government anyway.
@9P2B6X65mos5MO
Yes, if a timeline of 20 years has lapsed and it was not a felony, violent, financial o sexual crime
@9P25QCM5mos5MO
depends on the crime, if it indicates they could abuse their position then they should be disallowed.
@9P24S7J5mos5MO
Agree with all of the above stances, those who served their sentence from a crime they committed while not in office should be allowed to run. However, those who committed serious crimes should not be.
@9NZYR7F5mos5MO
Depending on the content of his crime, we can see whether he committed the crime from which side, whether it is just
@9NYL26J6mos6MO
Depends on how serious the crime was and when it occurred. For example something they did at the age of 17 shouldn't necessarily impact on their future as long as they learned from it etc. Not if it occurred whilst they have been in office.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
