A whistle blower is a person who exposes secretive information exposes an illegal act. In 1998 Parliament passed the Public Disclosure Act which protects whistleblowers from punishment by their employer. The act was notable in that it protected whistle blowers who had signed a non-disclosure agreement with their employer.
87% Yes |
13% No |
81% Yes |
12% No |
4% Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security |
0% No, but reduce their sentences |
2% Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained |
See how support for each position on “Whistleblower Protection” has changed over time for 67.8k UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Whistleblower Protection” has changed over time for 67.8k UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from UK users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9GHFFBN6mos6MO
Yes, but only if the information pertains to breach of UK laws, or international treaties/agreements/laws/organisations the UK is party to
@9G5MCLJ7mos7MO
Whistleblowers should be protected. If the information was obtained illegally, sentence them but with reduced sentences. If the information does threaten national security, it depends on the situation whether they are protected or not.
@9DSC38J8mos8MO
It depends on the illegal act
@9DLN48B8mos8MO
It would depend a lot on the specific instances. Whistle blowing deemed unnecessary should have consequences
@9D2G5NJ9mos9MO
Yes but ensure private investigations are launched to ensure the information revealed to pubic by whistle-blower is true. If information revealed by whistle-blowers is false ensure charges can be pressed
@9CYFBXS10mos10MO
Depends on nature of issue
Explore other topics that are important to UK voters.