Should there be term limits set for members of Congress?

No, but there should be a maximum age for running for re-election. If you're over state pension age at the election, you shouldn't be able to run.

No, providing we maintain fair and open elections.

No, but there should've be cognitive tests tbat must be passed.

No, But they should be encouraged by their party to stop campaigning after 3 terms to allow younger new politicians to become an MP

No, but any Member of Parliament who acts in contradiction to their responsibilities as such should be prevented from holding office

Longer-serving MPs often develop a deeper understanding of the political system, legislation, and the long-term consequences of policy decisions. With experience comes stronger judgement, greater expertise, and a better ability to navigate complex issues. Removing MPs purely because they have reached a set time limit risks losing valuable knowledge and continuity, particularly in areas that require long-term planning and consistency.

However, where I strongly disagree is in relation to the level of financial support MPs receive from taxpayers. The allowances provided for accommodation, food,…  Read more and personal expenses are excessively high and difficult to justify, particularly during times when many citizens are facing financial pressure. While it is reasonable for MPs to be supported in carrying out their duties, these budgets should be far more tightly controlled and transparent.

There shouldn't be term limits, however if the public want a re-election campaign, they should collectively decide to hold one.