In September 2022 British finance minister Kwasi Kwarteng outlined what he called an "unprecedented set of tax incentives" for businesses in newly-announced investment zones, saying the government would also liberalise planning rules for specified agreed sites. The government said there were potential investment zones in England so far but it would work with the devolved administrations in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland to deliver them around the United Kingdom. Areas interested in becoming investment zones include Liverpool and Greater Manchester in northwest England, Somerset and Plymouth in the southwest, Sunderland and the Tees Valley in the northeast and Southampton and Essex in the south and east.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Constituency
City
Parish
Response rates from 7k Labour voters.
57% Yes |
43% No |
40% Yes |
35% No |
8% Yes, as long as the local environment is not compromised |
5% No, spend that money on improving infrastructure and the community to attract companies |
4% Yes, if the company promises to create new jobs by hiring local residents |
2% No, the government should never subsidize private businesses |
4% Yes, as long as the tax revenue will eventually exceed the tax incentives |
1% No, but punish them for moving jobs out of the country |
1% Yes, but only if local citizens can vote on the amount of incentives to offer |
|
0% Yes, but I would prefer lowering corporate taxes to benefit all local companies |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 7k Labour voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 7k Labour voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Labour voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9P4GG7F5mos5MO
No -as long as the local environment is not compromised and alternative ways of working (I.e remote working- whereby you could hire an individual from anywhere nationally) is applicable and appropriate.
@9P7K5M25mos5MO
No, it's a bad policy, but central government should not provent local authorities from providing incentives if they want to.
@9RT3JKX4mos4MO
No, but relocation should be allowed, as long as the local environment is not compromised, but spend the money on improving infrastructure.
@9Q48XWN5mos5MO
Communities should be involved in decisions, in the workforce, in the management and in plan implementation. Also environmental legal protections should not be ignored.
@9J8HBZ210mos10MO
No, spend money on improving infrastructure and comunity to attract companies and punish them from movig jobs overseas.
@9J8G9KC10mos10MO
Spend money on improving infrastructure to atract companies and punish them for moving jobs overseas.
@9J7ZPWQ10mos10MO
Spend money to attract demstic and foreign investitors and punnish them from moving country overseas.
@9G5MCLJ1yr1Y
Punish them for moving jobs out of the country, don't subsidise the businesses unless the company will create new jobs for local and national industry, and the tax revenue will exceed the incentives in a short amount of time.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
