The Bedroom Tax (also known as Spare Room Subsidy) is a change to Housing Benefit Entitlement that restricts housing benefits for tenants of working age (16-61) living in a housing association or council property that is deemed to have one or more spare bedrooms. Tenants with one spare bedroom lose 14% of entitled housing benefit and those with two or more spare bedrooms lose 25% of entitlement. Possible exemptions exist for tenants receiving a state pension, rent a shared ownership property, have a severely disabled child who requires their own room, have a foster child, or have a child how is on duty in the armed forces.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Constituency
City
Parish
Response rates from 83.5k Conservatives voters.
82% Yes |
18% No |
53% Yes |
18% No |
18% Yes, but only if they refuse to move to an available smaller property |
|
10% Yes, but with exception for those with disabled family members |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 83.5k Conservatives voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 83.5k Conservatives voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Conservatives voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9Q636GC5mos5MO
There should be a contract that states when they no longer need all the bedrooms they are given something smaller, to meet the current need. Social housing should not be seen as a right to reside for life
@9PG7QMX5mos5MO
This should not be a situation which is allowed to happen as we have a housing crisis, it also should not be an option to refuse to move to an available smaller property, it should be mandatory at the earliest opportunity
@8S9H8FK4yrs4Y
Yes but only if they have been living in that property for under 10 years, any longer then they should automatically be exempt from paying any bedroom tax.
@8N84KDD4yrs4Y
They shouldn’t receive benefits.
@9SYD6YV3mos3MO
Only if the house is significantly smaller than it needs to be for a family. if bedrooms are tiny and cannot accommodate the household and there is no other option to solve the situation then benefits may be lent out
@9QWT87J4mos4MO
No, but housing should on a ‘need’ basis and re-assessed yearly so people can move to their ‘need’ level.
@9QW6FF84mos4MO
No/Maybe - The housing association should be fined for not finding or acquiring suitable accommodation. Fine the tenant only if tenant refuses to downsize given a suitable offer.
@9QLSK835mos5MO
Yes but only if they refuse to move to a smaller property with the exception being they can stay in that home if they have been there for ten years or more
Join in on the most popular conversations.
