62%
Yes
38%
No
42%
Yes
38%
No
16%
Yes, but require the labelling of foods that are genetically modified
4%
Yes, but producers should not be able to patent seeds

Historical Results

See how support for each position on “Genetically Modified Foods” has changed over time for 893k UK voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

See how importance of “Genetically Modified Foods” has changed over time for 893k UK voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from UK users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.

 @9MJZ995answered…5 days5D

Sometimes. Most genetic modification in nutritional products are done with the profit incentive in mind and the impacts on human, animal and soil health not well researched.

 @9MBHCMBanswered…2wks2W

It depends on the nature of the modification and requires many rules and regulations. But if it is a modification designed to harm wildlife then no

 @9HZKYP2 answered…2wks2W

Yes but only if producers are banned from patenting seeds and required by law to clearly label the GM foods, and after more independent research into the long term effects on biodiversity and food security as well as public health.

 @9M89YVRanswered…2wks2W

It should be done to increase nutrition as along as it doesn’t get to the point of it becoming a requirement to drive out non-genetically modified crops and foods.

 @9M4Y9XQanswered…3wks3W

Yes, but with regulations on attributes selected for and measures to reduce the impact of unintended seed dispersal

 @9LXWZW5answered…3wks3W

Yes, as long as it is made extremely clear to the buyers that they are genetically modified, and a lot of research is made into figuring out if they are safe to consume/imbibe.

Other Popular Questions

Explore other topics that are important to UK voters.