+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 812 South West voters.

93%
Yes
7%
No
93%
Yes
7%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 812 South West voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 812 South West voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from South West voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9MPC62Danswered…6mos6MO

Instead of allowing businesses to destroy food that hasn’t been sold, let it be taken for free

 @9ZGG6BBanswered…2wks2W

No. It should be up to businesses to find alternative ways to see that items not sold do not go to waste.

 @9RH39QQanswered…4mos4MO

Yes, but through means such as educating the public and local government and provide firms have a bigger role to play.

 @9QP6RVCanswered…5mos5MO

Food waste could be given to homeless people who require it as opposed to being thrown out of restaurants etc.

 @9QDKMQ4answered…5mos5MO

No but a programme by the supermarkets to give items close to the sell by date away to fiid banks and charities or even have families registered who they can offer it to for which they get paid by the govt a small fee to cover the transportation.

 @9Q83PJ8answered…5mos5MO

Yes, so long as this is targeted at supermarkets that waste food by the ton and not the consumer who might not eat 100% of their food.

 @9PWB7WCanswered…5mos5MO

Instead of investing to reduce food waste, invest in progams that can use the food or unused resources.

 @9PH7GB8answered…5mos5MO

Yes. As a single person it is impossible for me to buy fresh food without a lot of going to waste due to the large packet sizes. However most food waste is at the industrial level so ant programs would need to prioritise that over individual people.