+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 277 City of Nottingham voters.

94%
Yes
6%
No
94%
Yes
6%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 277 City of Nottingham voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 277 City of Nottingham voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from City of Nottingham voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9NSLXLCanswered…6mos6MO

Yes but they should prioritise brownfield sites and ensure that existing villages and towns are not over populated: i.e. boost the criteria and requirements for ensuring roads, infrastructure, schools, doctors, dentists etc. can cope with the additional populations. Otherwise, the houses sell but everyone’s quality of life decreases.

 @9QP4KY8answered…5mos5MO

Yes but for good quality estates. These need to be regulated and reach a certain standard of home. Not ones we are seeing that are falling apart within years

 @9QNVVV7answered…5mos5MO

There is plenty of vacant council owned flats or homes, particularly Westminster. Why aren’t they being used?

 @9QMSKWYanswered…5mos5MO

Yes, by liberalising planning rules such that the private sector hugely increases building of all types of housing.

 @9QKV3WBanswered…5mos5MO

The government should restrict people owning multiple properties. There should be more secure government owned social housing.

 @9QK5TTBanswered…5mos5MO

Yes, but not on green belt land. Abandoned and dilapidated buildings should be demolished and the land re-used

 @9QHV95Zanswered…5mos5MO

Yes, but with an infrastructure that can sustain new homes being built I.e new schools, GP surgeries etc.

 @9QH2MWHanswered…5mos5MO

as long as the homes were of good quality, not over populated and amenities were built alongside these to accommodate a growing population and reduce traffic