+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 373 Manchester voters.

66%
Yes
34%
No
66%
Yes
34%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 373 Manchester voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 373 Manchester voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Manchester voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9P6FP2Lanswered…6mos6MO

No, Take the existing rail networks under public ownership and invest in them, bringing prices down.

 @9P7K6HTanswered…6mos6MO

No, the UK is a small country and doesn't need high-speed rail. The government should nationalize and expand the existing rail network instead

 @9QNKBXBanswered…5mos5MO

Yes, but only if fully regulated and if networks are built within an agreed time period. Should the rail networks fail to deliver the projects then these subsidies should be withdrawn and/or handed back.

 @9QDVJWV answered…5mos5MO

This is a ridiculously expensive project now as we have failed to maintain the infrastructure. It would be an incredible benefit but there are more pressing priorities.

 @9N3YQNBanswered…6mos6MO

 @9N436MWanswered…6mos6MO

No, there should be subsidies to improve the capacity/frequency of the existing rail network

 @sandeepc152  from Maine  answered…6mos6MO

Only if it is owned by a UK company. The subsidy should be removed if sold or operated by a country outside the UK.

 @9N3T386answered…6mos6MO

Yes only if these networks will be accessible to all and ticket prices will be affordable