High-speed rail networks are fast train systems that connect major cities, providing a quick and efficient alternative to car and air travel. Proponents argue that it can reduce travel times, lower carbon emissions, and stimulate economic growth through improved connectivity. Opponents argue that it requires significant investment, may not attract enough users, and funds could be better used elsewhere.
62% Yes |
38% No |
62% Yes |
38% No |
See how support for each position on “High Speed Rail” has changed over time for 9.9k UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “High Speed Rail” has changed over time for 9.9k UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from UK users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9N836V21wk1W
Yes, on the provision this investment becomes returned.
@9N7ZTWP1wk1W
Yes, if the government can guarantee affordable fares.
@9N7ZJ591wk1W
Yes, providing that budgets and deadlines are strictly kept to and companies involved should be penalised when these targets are not met.
@9N7VBVZ1wk1W
Yes but enforce the environmental impact is low. And work on other public transport alternatives too
@9N7JKG31wk1W
Depends on who will benefit from this in terms of the stake holders
@9N7FH7H1wk1W
England is to small for high speed train. Just make more the trains on the rail and on time and cheaper
Explore other topics that are important to UK voters.
