+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 259 Classical Liberalism voters.

78%
Yes
22%
No
78%
Yes
22%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 259 Classical Liberalism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 259 Classical Liberalism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Classical Liberalism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9NQDL7Fanswered…6mos6MO

Depends on if it is possible in some areas, especially those in the middle of no where. Increase transportation and improve it first.

 @9QXRSPSanswered…5mos5MO

Improve public transport instead, and reduce the costs, and even provide free transport for low income individuals wherever possible.

 @9QH3V9Wanswered…5mos5MO

Yes, but also understand that this is not always practical for everyone i.e. parents doing school run before work.

 @9Q6QF3Wanswered…5mos5MO

The government should focus on fixing the cost of existing public transportation and improving rail and bus services.

 @9PZHF97answered…5mos5MO

Incentives would not be necessary if public transport was improved to be be more routes and more regular.

 @9PXBG35answered…5mos5MO

If the buses/trams/trains are taken under local control, prices are lowered to make it cheaper and routes are well provided for, this will work better.

 @9PTXJQManswered…5mos5MO

No, because this is logistically difficult. There are better ways to spend money on public transport.

 @9PGJZTTanswered…6mos6MO

Yes encourage car sharing, however this is not a new thing. However incentivize them how? This seems crazy.