Incentives for carpooling and shared transportation encourage people to share rides, reducing the number of vehicles on the road and lowering emissions. Proponents argue that it reduces traffic congestion, lowers emissions, and promotes community interactions. Opponents argue that it may not significantly impact traffic, could be costly, and some people prefer the convenience of personal vehicles.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
City
Response rates from 323 Non-Civil Parish or Community voters.
77% Yes |
23% No |
77% Yes |
23% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 323 Non-Civil Parish or Community voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 323 Non-Civil Parish or Community voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Non-Civil Parish or Community voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9NQDL7F6mos6MO
Depends on if it is possible in some areas, especially those in the middle of no where. Increase transportation and improve it first.
@9QXRSPS5mos5MO
Improve public transport instead, and reduce the costs, and even provide free transport for low income individuals wherever possible.
@9QH3V9W5mos5MO
Yes, but also understand that this is not always practical for everyone i.e. parents doing school run before work.
@9Q6QF3W5mos5MO
The government should focus on fixing the cost of existing public transportation and improving rail and bus services.
@9PZHF975mos5MO
Incentives would not be necessary if public transport was improved to be be more routes and more regular.
@9PXBG355mos5MO
If the buses/trams/trains are taken under local control, prices are lowered to make it cheaper and routes are well provided for, this will work better.
@9PTXJQM5mos5MO
No, because this is logistically difficult. There are better ways to spend money on public transport.
@9PGJZTT6mos6MO
Yes encourage car sharing, however this is not a new thing. However incentivize them how? This seems crazy.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
