Mandatory GPS tracking involves using GPS technology in all vehicles to monitor driving behavior and improve road safety. Proponents argue that it enhances road safety and reduces accidents by monitoring and correcting dangerous driving behaviors. Opponents argue that it infringes on personal privacy and could lead to government overreach and misuse of data.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
City
Response rates from 127 DE voters.
16% Yes |
84% No |
16% Yes |
84% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 127 DE voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 127 DE voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from DE voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9N928LD6mos6MO
Yes, but only for those convicted of road related offences, sex offenders and people aged under 21 years old.
@9N828LX6mos6MO
Yes but only on people with points on their licence or previous history of dangerous driving
@9P26G365mos5MO
Too complex for a yes/no answer, but this should be debated and a decision made based on factual information and a balance of practicality and morality.
@9QQ96B45mos5MO
i only agree that road safety should be improved the government should not be monitoring people’s gps
@9QL7H3L5mos5MO
GPS tracking should not be used, however road safety is important and use of black box technology for example to mandatory for all drivers to monitor driving behaviour rather than location tracking
@9QCWC7V5mos5MO
I really don't mind, got nothing to hide. But maybe the device could be installed to drivers who have a speeding offence
@Hixxy15mos5MO
Yes, but only used for those who have committed a motoring offence and to be removed after a certain period of time
@9PWDD5L 5mos5MO
Yes but it should not be unaffordable for people with cars. Companies must already install them with a marginal to no effect of the purchase price for the consumer
Join in on the most popular conversations.
