Genetic engineering involves modifying the DNA of organisms to prevent or treat diseases. Proponents argue that it could lead to breakthroughs in curing genetic disorders and improving public health. Opponents argue that it raises ethical concerns and potential risks of unintended consequences.
89% Yes |
11% No |
89% Yes |
11% No |
See how support for each position on “Genetic Engineering” has changed over time for 5.1k UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Genetic Engineering” has changed over time for 5.1k UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from UK users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9P9ZYRB1wk1W
Yes, but only where there is a clear and achievable goal of reducing diseases that are costly to treat and affect many people. It should be done on a value for money basis.
@9P8KB2Y1wk1W
Yes, but they should go through all ethics and research authorities before carrying out any form of modifications to human genetics.
@9P48H671wk1W
Think we already tried that with COVID 19 and it didn't turn out all that well did it? Much stricter regulations and safety procedures need put in place to ensure these genetically modified diseases and viruses don't escape again.
@9NZQVNH2wks2W
Yes, but in a controlled way, you have to be super careful about what you're managing out of the population
@9NX2VRP 2wks2W
Yes - to ensure any innovations are for all and not restricted to those who can pay
@9NTVFS62wks2W
I think we would need to look into navigating any ethical issues. Also, if it is more likely to cause issues down the line, such as overuse of antibiotics had become a problem, then we need to consider if this is worth it or are we creating more problems for future generations to have to deal with.
Explore other questions that UK voters are discussing.
