CRISPR is a powerful tool for editing genomes, allowing for precise modifications to DNA that allows scientists to better understand gene functions, model diseases more accurately, and develop innovative treatments. Proponents argue that regulation ensures safe and ethical use of the technology. Opponents argue that too much regulation could stifle innovation and scientific progress.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Parish
Response rates from 160 CH voters.
68% Yes |
32% No |
68% Yes |
32% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 160 CH voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 160 CH voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from CH voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9MPWSXM10mos10MO
Yes, but only if this prevents a child being born with a life threatening illness or deformity. Not for cosmetic or increase of brain, muscle or social ability.
@9PVDYGV8mos8MO
Yes, but for the prevention of serious genetic conditions rather than for so-called "designer babies"
@9NFTQNV9mos9MO
Yes, they should go through all ethics and research authorities before carrying out any form of modifications to human genetics.
@9MQM3KX10mos10MO
It depends on whether someone may be born with a genetic defect.
@9MNTBJJ10mos10MO
Yes, but only for things that are necessary and considered essential
@9ZNDRC44mos4MO
Yes but only for humans who would need it the most and could change their life i.e. people with certain disabilities which could be fixed.
@9YM74564mos4MO
In certain cases of genetic disorders it should be used but the use of it for aesthetic purposes is morally incorrect.
@9TQYQQR6mos6MO
Keep it in testing and make sure financial compensation is given to people willing to trial them out
Join in on the most popular conversations.
