Should the government ban specific dog breeds that are deemed dangerous?

The Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 allows the UK government to ban breeds considered physically powerful and prone to aggression, such as the Pit Bull Terrier and recently the XL Bully. Critics, including the RSPCA, argue that breed-specific legislation is flawed because aggression is determined by upbringing, not genetics, and identifying mixed breeds is scientifically difficult. Supporters claim that certain dogs were bred for fighting and pose a lethal risk to the public that outweighs the right to ownership. Proponents argue bans prevent horrific injuries and deaths caused by 'weaponized' dogs. Opponents argue that bad owners will simply move on to the next powerful breed, and we should license the owner, not the dog.