Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
外交政策 › 人权法案
8>8 Personal answerNo, but maybe look to amend any parts that are ineffective but do not tamper with rights/democracy |
医保 › NHS私有化
8>8 Personal answerNo to full privatisation but invest and do what is needed to improve the NHS as is, just because it's a loved service improvement must happen |
外交政策 › 欧洲联盟
8>8 Personal answerNeutral view, at first yes then no, but now somewhere in the middle |
经济 › 税
8>8 Personal answerYes but focus on lowering taxes for the poor as a priority and get companies such a google to pay their fair share first |
移民 › 恐怖嫌疑分子驱逐出境
8>8 Personal answerYes in some cases however mainly bring them to justice in this country, the same for non immigrants so there's no double standards |
社会 › Gender Transition
8>8 Personal answerYes from 16 onwards and proper support and counselling and so on, possibly even months and years before so they feel supported but not influenced in any decision they make |
医保 › 单一支付者医保
8>8 Personal answerYes but allow people to choose private services instead if they want and make sure that the NHS actually improves with money paid in taxes |
国内政策 › 政府监视
8>8 Personal answerNo, it should only be used for individuals they consider dangerous and a threat |
社会 › Hate Speech
8>8 Personal answerNo if it is actually hate speech e.g racial or violent, yes if it is criticism of governments or individuals as this is democracy |
移民 › 移民
8>8 Personal answerIt can't be properly answered given the fact it never seems clear enough, so I can't take a side |
环境 › Fox Hunting
8>8 Personal answer不 |
经济 › 豪宅税
8>8 Personal answerNo, tax the richer part of society in different ways, this most likely wouldn't help solve anything |
医保 › NHS 利润偿还
8>8 Personal answerYes but only if the private service has no value to patients and doesn't help with the reducing the strain on the NHS |
教育 › Critical Race Theory in K-12 Education
8>8 Personal answerYes, we cannot end racism until we acknowledge that our institutions, laws, and history are inherently racist |
移民 › 移民同化
8>8 Personal answerBasic English perhaps for the good of everyone, if not embrace different cultures |
医保 › Vaccine Passports
8>8 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › United States of Europe
8>8 Personal answerNeutral, that would be a choice for EU countries of which we are no longer a part of |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
8>8 Personal answer不应该,而是要激励消费者重复利用这些产品 |
教育 › 普通中等教育证书考试
8>8 Personal answerYes but other qualifications should also be offered so if they don't do well on a traditional exam, they can gain a qualification in another area |
教育 › 标准化的课程
8>8 Personal answerIn places however there should be flexibility to adapt to the needs and abilities of different students/schools, 1 blanket curriculum covering schools isn't always productive |
经济 › 全民基本收入
8>8 Personal answerYes but allow those most in need access quicker than those with a stable and solid income |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
交通运输 › 公共交通
8>8 Personal answerYes and reduce costs to travel as this will benefit a lot in the long run |
环境 › Animal Testing
8>8 Personal answerOnly if absolutely necessary if not, never |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
8>8 Personal answer不,政府不应决定什么是假新闻,什么是真新闻 |
交通运输 › National Railway
8>8 Personal answerNo because privatisation rarely works but allow a trial to see if standards improve but involve all staff |
国内政策 › 英国君主立宪制
8>8 Personal answerNo because an alternative could be worse and a lot more difficult, it should be open to greater reform and scrutiny though |
医保 › 紧急医疗服务
8>8 Personal answerYes but only if they can afford it, if not provide free healthcare, same for British citizens if we need healthcare abroad |
移民 › 公民考试
8>8 Personal answer是,但只限于非常基础和简单的话题 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
8>8 Personal answerNo, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment |
移民 › 技术移民
8>8 Personal answerI have no stance, but anyone should have a chance at high skilled work |
经济 › 32-Hour Work Week
8>8 Personal answerNo, many essential workers work more than that, allow bosses and workers to decide the hours |
外交政策 › 三叉戟核武器方案
8>8 Personal answerKeep the programme as a deterrent but gradually cut funding and try to encourage world peace |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
8>8 Personal answer不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性 |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
8>8 Personal answer不,如果他们这样做了我会更加尊敬但是不应该要求他们做 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
8>8 Personal answerIncrease funding for social and community based programmes, but also leave existing funding in for ths police, then if they work side by side resources could stretch better |
医保 › 安全港
8>8 Personal answer应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
8>8 Personal answerNo, invest in government run prisons and stop privatising everything |
经济 › 工会
8>8 Personal answerHelp in places but should be politically neutral and donations should be discouraged |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
8>8 Personal answer是的,任何缴纳税费的人都应该有投票的权利 |
总统大选 › 有犯罪前科的政客
8>8 Personal answerYes but only low level crime, not for violent crimes |
移民 › EU Migrant Quota
8>8 Personal answerPossibly, but however they try to impose rules they can be broken so it's a bit pointless |
移民 › 双重国籍
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
8>8 Personal answerNo, it isn't something that should be but I respect free speech |
医保 › World Health Organization
8>8 Personal answerNo, fund national and local programs instead |
外交政策 › 阿富汗
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
移民 › Migrant Children
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
8>8 Personal answerNo, but invest in building and expanding prisons more and offer more rehabilitation services |
外交政策 › EU Authoritarian Sanctions
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
8>8 Personal answerNo, capture, interrogate, and imprison them instead |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
8>8 Personal answerNo but if you allow it, allow any political advertising regardless of whether it goes against rules/guidelines and make sure it's all balanced |
外交政策 › Central EU Agency
8>8 Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 任期限制
8>8 Personal answer不,我们已经有任期限制了就是“选举” |
教育 › 免费学校
8>8 Personal answerNo, focus money on improving existing schools first, if not then try free schools |
外交政策 › European Commission
8>8 Personal answerNo because the UK has left so we now have no reason for involvement in such decision |
交通运输 › 伦敦地铁
8>8 Personal answerNo because everyone, whether in essential work or not, has a right to strike in a democratic society |
教育 › School Truancy
8>8 Personal answerYes, they should help the students and families and try to understand the reasons for truancy |
经济 › Free Broadband
8>8 Personal answerProvide it to those who can't afford it only |
教育 › Charter Schools
8>8 Personal answerNo, we should focus on improving our public schools and increasing teacher wages instead |
国内政策 › 反社会行为令(ASBOs)
8>8 Personal answerYes but only is are effective and prevent future offending |
外交政策 › European Union Countries
8>8 Personal answer不 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
8>8 Personal answerYes as long as existing jobs are protected and new ones are created |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “deregulation”, meaning you more often believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. 这一主题是对你最重要的。
You are a centrist on environmentalism and anthropocentrism issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on politically incorrect and politically correct issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on nationalism and globalism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “left wing”, meaning you more often support policies that promote social and economic equality. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on multiculturalism and assimilation issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “big government”, meaning you more often believe the government should do more to address social inequality, corruption, and assistance for its citizens. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side moderately towards “decentralization”, meaning you believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on religious and secular issues. 这一主题只是对你最重要的。
You side slightly towards “militarism”, meaning you more often believe we should use whatever force necessary to protect ourselves against foreign threats. 这一主题只是对你最重要的。
You are a centrist on isolationism and imperialism issues. 这一主题只是对你最重要的。
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 13 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.