Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
医保 › NHS私有化
8>8 Personal answerThe NHS needs a whole new rebuild from top to bottom, In it's current form it is collapsing and no longer fit for purpose. To many middle managers, way to much money wasted on vanity projects. It is also becoming a political football for both sides. The NHS is also being ripped off by the prices it pays, Way to many have their hands in the NHS money pot and taking out of it. |
社会 › Gender Transition
8>8 Personal answer不 |
医保 › 单一支付者医保
8>8 Personal answerYes, but allow people to use private insurance |
社会 › Hate Speech
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
8>8 Personal answerThis is a none issue the real question is maybe we should keep a better eye on those we are watching already and stop anyone who is an known extremist from entering. |
移民 › 移民
8>8 Personal answerStop the illegals ones as if we reward them for coming we are only encouraging more to risk the dangers and fund the smugglers. It also sends a bad message to those who bother with the legal channels if we just allow illegals to cross and then be rewarded. But we do need stronger border control. |
环境 › Fox Hunting
8>8 Personal answer不 |
教育 › Critical Race Theory in K-12 Education
8>8 Personal answer不 |
移民 › 移民同化
8>8 Personal answerYes, But if they have learning disabilities or incapable of speech or something like this then we waive this requirement. |
经济 › 社会福利
8>8 Personal answerIt needs to be looked at more on a individual case by case level rather than some sweeping decision. elderly and disabled though need more help and more to live on. |
经济 › 遗产税
8>8 Personal answerBit disgusting to be robbing the money of the dead really ain't it. We got taxed all life now you want to rob the dead. |
外交政策 › United States of Europe
8>8 Personal answer不 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
8>8 Personal answer不 |
经济 › 全民基本收入
8>8 Personal answerSounds good in theory, But never works and it would be used by some future more evil Government for tyranny if not careful. Sounds like the empty promises of communism to me and well bread lines are not fun. |
环境 › Animal Testing
8>8 Personal answer不 |
交通运输 › 公共交通
8>8 Personal answerGov might want to make it affordable to even get on Public transport first. There cost rises are making it unaffordable. |
外交政策 › Ukraine and Nato
8>8 Personal answerNot now as it would initiate WW3. |
交通运输 › National Railway
8>8 Personal answerYes, but allow more local control |
医保 › 紧急医疗服务
8>8 Personal answerYes, and require visitors to show proof of insurance before entering the UK. But The UK is a country of kindness and life threatening care should not be withdrawn from those who can't afford it. The payment can be dealt with later. |
外交政策 › Taliban Financial Aid
8>8 Personal answer不 |
经济 › 福利毒品测试
8>8 Personal answerNo, Leads down a dark road to lose of personal freedoms and bodily autonomy. Of course unless the Politicians and civil servants want to go first. |
移民 › 技术移民
8>8 Personal answer减少,而且政府应该更多地鼓励我国公民为担任这些工作做好准备。 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
8>8 Personal answerYes, but with strict training on how and when to use the equipment |
经济 › 32-Hour Work Week
8>8 Personal answerNo and it is to simple a question to cover such a wide reaching topic. |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
8>8 Personal answer不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格 |
总统大选 › 最低投票年龄
8>8 Personal answerNo people who are 18 barely understand politics and are easy to sway already. Any younger than that and problems increase. |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
8>8 Personal answer不 |
医保 › 安全港
8>8 Personal answerNo, many of these drugs are life ruining, Weed yes you should legalise it and in one sweep you would cripple the drug dealers and also bring in huge revenues for the state who would tax weed as they do Tobacco now. But creating drug zones would only fuel the addiction. |
罪行 › Private Prisons
8>8 Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
8>8 Personal answer不 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
8>8 Personal answerNo because if you remove the right to vote as an exclusive perk of citizenship was it the real worth or value of it to begin with. And We must remember this makes our Democracy more vulnerable to outside agents placing people in our very easy to swing communities at voting time to maybe place in MPs who would follow their orders. |
移民 › EU Migrant Quota
8>8 Personal answer不 |
移民 › 双重国籍
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
医保 › Vaccine Mandates for Customers
8>8 Personal answer不 |
医保 › World Health Organization
8>8 Personal answer不 |
移民 › Migrant Children
8>8 Personal answerDepends if the Parents are already in the UK and live here legally. Children should not be abandoned alone and maybe we should investigate such careless parents. |
外交政策 › EU Authoritarian Sanctions
8>8 Personal answerUK yes EU well that is their choice. |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country |
外交政策 › 北约
8>8 Personal answer是的,拒绝保卫其他北约国家开创了一个全球力量平衡的危险先例 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
8>8 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Central EU Agency
8>8 Personal answerSounds dangerous really, and likely would be a danger if any EU nation went rogue or became tyrannical. |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
8>8 Personal answerYes, and create more social programs to provide free food, clothing, and medicine |
国内政策 › 任期限制
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
教育 › 免费学校
8>8 Personal answerReally depends on Who is using the money and are watched to make sure the money is spent on the school, students and teachers. And not pocketed away or stolen. |
外交政策 › European Commission
8>8 Personal answerNot our issue we are out the EU. |
教育 › School Truancy
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
经济 › Free Broadband
8>8 Personal answerNo, this will cost the government over £50bn |
教育 › Charter Schools
8>8 Personal answerNo, we should focus on improving our public schools and increasing teacher wages instead |
外交政策 › European Union Countries
8>8 Personal answerYes, but I would prefer to abolish the European Union |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
8>8 Personal answerNo, spend that money on improving infrastructure and the community to attract companies |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “deregulation”, meaning you more often believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. 这一主题是对你最重要的。
You are a centrist on environmentalism and anthropocentrism issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on politically incorrect and politically correct issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on nationalism and globalism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “left wing”, meaning you more often support policies that promote social and economic equality. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on multiculturalism and assimilation issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “big government”, meaning you more often believe the government should do more to address social inequality, corruption, and assistance for its citizens. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side moderately towards “decentralization”, meaning you believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on religious and secular issues. 这一主题只是对你最重要的。
You side slightly towards “militarism”, meaning you more often believe we should use whatever force necessary to protect ourselves against foreign threats. 这一主题只是对你最重要的。
You are a centrist on isolationism and imperialism issues. 这一主题只是对你最重要的。
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 14 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.