Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
医保 › 精神健康
9>9 Personal answer应该,我们的精神健康护理系统需要更多资金以提供更高质量的关怀和服务 |
医保 › NHS私有化
9>9 Personal answerNeutral, but such services should be accessible and made better for everyone. |
社会 › Gender Transition
9>9 Personal answerYES, 100% but age or circumstance appropriate and with full understanding and safeguarding giving, and with more age restrictions and safeguarding in place, more securely and appropriately, and with parental and doctors permission and guidance, as long as done also for anyone that needs it 100% safely and structured, especially in more invasive options and treatments like operations and hormone therapy, and also if circumstances are absolutely necessary. It should also go on a case by case bases but have foundations in place that support all people and needs, not just transgender, intersex, people or those with medical conditions |
医保 › 单一支付者医保
9>9 Personal answerYes, but allow people to use private insurance |
国内政策 › 政府监视
9>9 Personal answerYes and no, privacy and boundaries should be kept however for certain circumstances or when and where necessary, for people with histories of criminal behaviour or terrorism then yes but with court orders and done properly and appropriately, affect to the circumstance at hand. Otherwise, no. So I have a neutral/between view. |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
9>9 Personal answer不 |
社会 › Hate Speech
9>9 Personal answerNo, and increase penalties for hate speech |
环境 › Fox Hunting
9>9 Personal answer不 |
科学 › 强制接种疫苗
9>9 Personal answer是的,它们对保护其他对接种疫苗来说还太小的孩子来说是至关重要的 |
教育 › Critical Race Theory in K-12 Education
9>9 Personal answerYes, and also add Intersectionality and the 1619 Project to the curriculum |
外交政策 › Ukrainian Defense Funding
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › United States of Europe
9>9 Personal answerNeutral. |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
教育 › 标准化的课程
9>9 Personal answerNeutral, however all curriculum should be age, needs and circumstance appropriate, regardless of material or curriculum |
交通运输 › 公共交通
9>9 Personal answerYes but make more free means of transport or more accessible, generally and more environmentally friendly/sufficient, especially long term and or more more vulnerable people and communities, and better funding, expenses, means and safeguarding/policies surrounding public transport |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
9>9 Personal answerYES, however I also think users and businesses/sites, especially in the case of social media as this question is getting at, should be held to higher standards and accountability, especially in terms of or for protection. I also think sites/the internet as a whole, especially popular social media, should be more regulated and appropriately/affectively safe guarded, and actions taken when and where necessary, especially in regards to fake or debunked or illegal sources, information and hate speech or other trolling or toxic, inappropriate and or fake/false rhetoric and news/behaviour. |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
9>9 Personal answer应该,要禁用可降解材料最低含量不到 75% 的所有一次性产品 |
交通运输 › National Railway
9>9 Personal answerYes, but allow more local control |
环境 › Animal Testing
9>9 Personal answer不 |
社会 › Teacher and Faculty Diversity Training
9>9 Personal answerYes, and all schools should require mandatory diversity training |
移民 › 公民考试
9>9 Personal answer是,但只限于非常基础和简单的话题 |
国内政策 › 国家服务
9>9 Personal answer应该,但是应该把重点放在教育和技能发展上,不要过于注重军事训练。 |
经济 › 福利毒品测试
9>9 Personal answerYes and no, neutral stance, depends on why and the circumstances or severity of circumstances. Anyone struggling with mental/physical health and or addiction issues, or general testing positive should also be given proper and further/better help, resources, support, rehabilitation, and it should be further/better safeguarded too, and still a choice, the same goes for overall health or things like misusing benefits, whether someone works or not, everyone should be able to get tests by choice or if mandatory especially. All tests should have safeguarding and restrictions, and still respect rights, even of those testing positive or with addiction issues, to make it harder to misuse/claim benefits depending on circumstances and protect people, especially those most vulnerable, and when people abuse or take advantages of benefits, there should be more standards and actions taken's as necessary and appropriately/affectively to suit the circumstances and stop people from doing so. |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
9>9 Personal answer不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性 |
经济 › 32-Hour Work Week
9>9 Personal answerYes, I also think hours and resources/other accommodations should be flexible/more flexible and more safeguarded for vulnerable or home workers. |
社会 › Employee Diversity Training
9>9 Personal answerYes, and all companies should require mandatory diversity training |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
9>9 Personal answer不,如果他们这样做了我会更加尊敬但是不应该要求他们做 |
移民 › 技术移民
9>9 Personal answer增加,我们的经济依赖于那些以最低的成本雇佣技术最好的工人的企业。 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
9>9 Personal answerYes but with stricter safeguarding, and only in certain or absolutely necessary/extreme situation, and there should be stricter, longer and or more in depth, appropriate training and teaching of how to use such, especially the stricter the policies around own or using weaponry and equipment/resources or if deadly/strong weapons etc. And anyone who uses or owns sound should only do so with appropriate reasons and heavy, successful tests to make sure they are fit, etc, mentally and physically, to even use or own such, and against policies and safeguarding should be made stricter and or more secure, and safe for everyone or left to specialised agencies with specialised and appropriate weapons, etc for circumstances and that are again safeguarded with those using/owning such all 100% clear and fit to do so. |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
9>9 Personal answerYes, and abolish the police |
社会 › Student Diversity Training
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
9>9 Personal answer不 |
总统大选 › 最低投票年龄
9>9 Personal answerYes, 100%, however it should be further and more securely/better safeguarded and done appropriately, there should still be some sort of age or general restrictions. |
医保 › 安全港
9>9 Personal answer应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。 |
环境 › Electric Vehicle Charging Stations
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only if they use renewable energy sources |
移民 › EU Migrant Quota
9>9 Personal answerDepending on circumstances, yes, and there should be proper checks done, alongside more help and resources given out, otherwise, neutral on this question. I'm for immigrants. |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
9>9 Personal answerNo, I think businesses should require vaccination but not by government mandate |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
移民 › 双重国籍
9>9 Personal answer是,除非他们实施了恐怖主义行为 |
总统大选 › Mental competency testing
9>9 Personal answerYes, and politicians of any age should be required to pass a mental competency test |
移民 › Migrant Children
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
9>9 Personal answerNeutral, yes depending on person, case, circumstances and crime committed, and to how repeatedly offending the convict/individual is and to the severity and circumstances around such. Also programmes and services, and resources should be more accessible, better and safeguarded for everyone to help, support, teach and or rehabilitate, etc certain kinds of individuals or criminals, especially those with mental health issues or disabilities and that come from traumatic backgrounds or rougher areas, and more overall general restrictions and safeguarding should be put in place or reformed to keep staff and prisoners, and even visitors etc safe and handled appropriately, especially on circumstance or danger levels of the criminal(s). |
医保 › World Health Organization
9>9 Personal answerNo, fund national and local programs instead |
外交政策 › EU Authoritarian Sanctions
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › 北约
9>9 Personal answer是的,拒绝保卫其他北约国家开创了一个全球力量平衡的危险先例 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
9>9 Personal answerNeutral, neither for nor against however I think yes, in some cases especially when promoting or advertising political misinformation, recycled harmful rhetoric and harmful/unjust biases or smear campaigns in general, especially on social media |
外交政策 › Central EU Agency
9>9 Personal answer不 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
9>9 Personal answerNo, they should be captured and given a fair trial |
国内政策 › 任期限制
9>9 Personal answer是的,并且降低他们的薪水和退休福利 |
经济 › 卧室税
9>9 Personal answer是的但是对于那些残疾家庭成员的例外 |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
9>9 Personal answerYes, and create more social programs to provide free food, clothing, and medicine |
外交政策 › European Commission
9>9 Personal answer不 |
医保 › Medical Consensus
9>9 Personal answerNeutral, depends on circumstances but also science can change and sub unconventional or generally different approaches should not be discarded or disapproved/sneered at, either way things should be done appropriately and safeguarded, and more should be done to protect and prevent people/things, as much as possible, but even treatments etc are not always one size fits all and not all data is rigid or right. |
教育 › School Truancy
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
经济 › Free Broadband
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › 反社会行为令(ASBOs)
9>9 Personal answerNeutral stance, depends on circumstances and I feel mental and physical health, and family lives of many who get ASBO'S whilst in some minor cases it may help, it's not affective long term and not really helpful, we should be looking at reforming and bettering mental and general health services and resources, rehabilitation programmes etc, especially where youth and young offenders are concerned |
教育 › Charter Schools
9>9 Personal answerNo, we should focus on improving our public schools and increasing teacher wages instead |
外交政策 › European Union Countries
9>9 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Saudi Arabia and Iran
9>9 Personal answerYes, we should always promote diplomatic peace talks during foreign conflicts |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
9>9 Personal answerYes, as long as the local environment is not compromised |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “deregulation”, meaning you more often believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. 这一主题是对你最重要的。
You are a centrist on environmentalism and anthropocentrism issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on politically incorrect and politically correct issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on nationalism and globalism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “left wing”, meaning you more often support policies that promote social and economic equality. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on multiculturalism and assimilation issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “big government”, meaning you more often believe the government should do more to address social inequality, corruption, and assistance for its citizens. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side moderately towards “decentralization”, meaning you believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on religious and secular issues. 这一主题只是对你最重要的。
You side slightly towards “militarism”, meaning you more often believe we should use whatever force necessary to protect ourselves against foreign threats. 这一主题只是对你最重要的。
You are a centrist on isolationism and imperialism issues. 这一主题只是对你最重要的。
Based on 14 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 15 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.