Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
医保 › NHS私有化
S>S Personal answerNHS is a farce. It is mainly for research on the human body. I approached them so that they can send their patients to me. They rejected i.e. Silent |
社会 › Gender Transition
S>S Personal answer不 |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
S>S Personal answer不 |
社会 › Hate Speech
S>S Personal answerYes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech |
环境 › Fox Hunting
S>S Personal answer不 |
经济 › 社会福利
S>S Personal answerSome cases are genuine. For example many OAP are out working as they are unable to cover living costs which have rising considerably. Welfare benefits on immigrants or those homeless, each case needs to be investigated and opportunities for specific employment according to their choice should be make available. Consideration of language barriers, family etc needs to be taken into account or else immigrants should not be allowed in. This should be included in a clause before they enter the country |
环境 › 环境规制
S>S Personal answerWithout CO2 Emissions life becomes non existant. Chemical Trails sprayed on all life, the invisible biological warefare and HAARP is the cause of air pollution |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
S>S Personal answer不 |
科学 › 强制接种疫苗
S>S Personal answerIf the truth be know, that is why there is the PHAR ma Ceutical Industry with HO in USA for an ECO NOMIC reason. All DISEASES are man made. Every disease is curable NATURALLY. I cured a disabled person on loads of medication and then had the police and social workers knock on my door because I am a threat to the E con NO MONEY!!! |
教育 › 标准化的课程
S>S Personal answerdepends on what the standard curriculum is |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
S>S Personal answerExample of Fake News is WHO. Today I attended a Webinar called Religions for Peace which turned out that through the Priests, Religious Teachers WHO were bribing £25,000 each to promote the falsehoods of JABS to encourage ALL to be Jabbed. Why? Mass Genocide. Yet they also mentioned that fake news should be removed. WHO are the source of FAKE NEWS. |
经济 › 32-Hour Work Week
S>S Personal answeremployees choice |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
S>S Personal answer不 |
环境 › Animal Testing
S>S Personal answerout with pharmaceuticals the cause of mass genocide the planned demic |
交通运输 › National Railway
S>S Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
S>S Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
S>S Personal answer是的 |
教育 › Critical Race Theory in K-12 Education
S>S Personal answerYes, we cannot end racism until we acknowledge that our institutions, laws, and history are inherently racist |
外交政策 › 阿富汗
S>S Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
S>S Personal answerterms and conditions apply |
移民 › Migrant Children
S>S Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
S>S Personal answerNo, and abolish the police |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
S>S Personal answer不 |
移民 › 双重国籍
S>S Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › EU Authoritarian Sanctions
S>S Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
S>S Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › 任期限制
S>S Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › Central EU Agency
S>S Personal answer不 |
经济 › Free Broadband
S>S Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 英国议会
S>S Personal answerWithout Prejudice....Currently none appears to uphold truth. All seem to support the planned demic for mass genocide. None have the courage to speak out against the Biological Weapons which is the true cause of deaths. WHO dictates to the world and bribes Religious Leaders with £25,000 per case of promoting and convincing individuals to take the jab.Currently this is a Demonically Plagued Island which has no hope whatsoever of rising, unless TRUTH is disclosed, unless DECEIT is uprooted. This Monkey/Black Plagued Island will physically dissolve |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
S>S Personal answerLet us understand that UK is no Saintly country. What has been done to Julian Assange. What about the mass genocide with vax sin nations jabs? etc |
教育 › Charter Schools
S>S Personal answerThe educational system has failed for generations. |
经济 › 跨大西洋贸易和投资伙伴
S>S Personal answerThis is diverse in several sectors each to its own merit |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
S>S Personal answer不 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “deregulation”, meaning you more often believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. 这一主题是对你最重要的。
You are a centrist on environmentalism and anthropocentrism issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on politically incorrect and politically correct issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on nationalism and globalism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “left wing”, meaning you more often support policies that promote social and economic equality. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on multiculturalism and assimilation issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “big government”, meaning you more often believe the government should do more to address social inequality, corruption, and assistance for its citizens. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side moderately towards “decentralization”, meaning you believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on religious and secular issues. 这一主题只是对你最重要的。
You side slightly towards “militarism”, meaning you more often believe we should use whatever force necessary to protect ourselves against foreign threats. 这一主题只是对你最重要的。
You are a centrist on isolationism and imperialism issues. 这一主题只是对你最重要的。
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 16 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.