Animal testing is the use of non-human animals in experiments that seek to control the variables that affect the behavior or biological system under study. The United Kingdom was the first country in the world to implement laws protecting animals. In 1822 an Act to Prevent the Cruel and Improper Treatment of Cattle was passed by Parliament. The UK government has publicly stated that animals are sentient beings, not merely commodities, and has confirmed its commitment to the highest possible standards of animal welfare. Animal Welfare Act, an overhaul of pet abuse laws replacing the Protection of Animals Act, came into force in England and Wales in 2007.
Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Constituency:
@B3PN5ZQ 3wks3W
No. They should be tested on paedophiles, killers, rapists and anyone who is doing a prison sentence for beating children, elderly and disabled people.
@9PRXCX49mos9MO
If it is for deadly diseases yes , but for any other reason no , we must try our best to live with god's creation
@9PRFKXV9mos9MO
No, convicted criminals serving life sentences should do their part for society and be tested on. It will provide more accurate results.
@9PM73LBWomen's Equality9mos9MO
Although I don't agree with animal testing buy also there are so many people that have had negative effects from testing so either way isn't great
@9PJNZYK9mos9MO
No, how can the government talk about making artificial meat for human consumption but not outlaw product testing on animals. If we can make meat safe for human consumption, we can Damm we’ll test sunscreen on it.
@9NZBMXF10mos10MO
No, surely there are other ways to test on human tissue without using animals. If not then should only be for medical reasons, not cosmetic.
@9JFNH8T1yr1Y
Yes, but not for cosmetics and only as a last resort if human testing or any other forms of testing have been deemed both not possible and unethical
@B4K34202yrs2Y
Only so long as it’s is the most scientifically efficient way of testing, should be abolished if more effective form of testing is discovered.
Yes but not for cosmetics and only rodents, no primates, cats,dogs or rabbits
@9N29VMF10mos10MO
Yes but in accordance to ASPA laws. If there are no alternatives then the use of NHA should be approved.
@9MZKGBCConservative10mos10MO
Why test on animals, surely in these days of AI and high tech we should be able to get a better system of testing
@9MZ7MJ7Plaid Cymru10mos10MO
Yes, but not for cosmetics, only when absolutely essential, and in the most humane way possible, for revolutionary drugs/vaccines not for relives to common ailments
@9M3XW9Q11mos11MO
Researchers will continue to do it somewhere in the world, we should make sure that cruelty is minimised so that if it has to happen it should be as humane as possible. If we ban it here it will just happen somewhere else where there is less regulation and is worse for the animals.
@9LXK8SH11mos11MO
no #savetheanimals if you were in the animals position you would not want to be used as a test subject.
@9BNQBPN2yrs2Y
No, animals and humans are not the same. This will always be messed up.
@96PQLP92yrs2Y
No. Use murderers instead.
@96HVJ8R2yrs2Y
Test on animals for life saving medical purposes but not on cosmetic
@95JNLFC3yrs3Y
No, tests these drugs on criminals rather than innocent animals
@94KB9253yrs3Y
Only if there is no other option. Never for cosmetics
@943QDKJ3yrs3Y
If it’s something for humans, then the animal might live but we die and vice versa.
@93VFQMK3yrs3Y
Yes, but by licence where theyve proved there is not other way of testing apart from on animals
@93THXVP3yrs3Y
Test on violent criminals first
@8Z7PZXY3yrs3Y
Yes, under strict ethical and welfare guidance with other testing methods used where possible
@8Y5FR433yrs3Y
Only as a last test before human usage, not in the riskier stages
@8XDRKVB3yrs3Y
I think that animals should only be used for things that could kill human testers such as early vaccine prototypes. however, animals should not be used for makeup and cosmetics
@8WTNF6XLiberal Democrat3yrs3Y
Yes as long as it doesn't cause pain or death
@8TC6JMF4yrs4Y
Yes and on humans too . we have a ready source of human guinea pigs locked up in our jails & a stream of possibilities coming through the courts .
In all honesty for a useful life & giving back some thing to the society they live in could they be utilized this type of research for a payment of release & income support/ compensation for a few years or looked after if they are damaged beyond repair or survival. It would certainly be more cost effective all round than keeping them locked up or on the permanent merry go round of jail , release reoffending , getting caught again , jail etc. .
Perhaps these Chinese really are far more advanced than the so called civilised western world .
@8TB9KXX4yrs4Y
Absolutely Not. Barbaric.
@8SSXP8R4yrs4Y
Only for situations where it is impossible not to e.g. vaccines, or untested vital medicines. Animals should never be used for any other reasons.
@8SPZLH34yrs4Y
Only for serious/life threatening conditions
@8SPSKDX4yrs4Y
No cause that how we have covid
@8SMCBY24yrs4Y
I am for testing the safety of drugs that are designed to improve animal welfare. I am strongly against testing cosmetics and such for human use.
@8SL6C6C4yrs4Y
If it is potential to effect life or death yes or certain criminals, not for cosmetic purposes
@8SK2V5W4yrs4Y
Yes, if there is no alternatives
No it should be for criminals who have committed sexual, murder or terror offences.
@8SJGYM74yrs4Y
Definitely not for cosmetic testing. As for medical testing only in cases of extreme need (e.g. cancer treatments) & once they are in final stages of testing. Setup initiatives in correctional facilities for inmates to volunteer for testing. They should receive monetary compensation (to be given upon release) and it should count as hours served towards community service.
@8SDZ7X84yrs4Y
Only if its not possible to test in any other way
@8S6JB3J4yrs4Y
yes but only on certain animals e.g rats mice
@8S42P7J4yrs4Y
Yes but only medical research
@8S2PDLL4yrs4Y
Yes, It there is no other viable option
@8RPG9V74yrs4Y
Yes but only once. Performed humanely
@8RL5VLD4yrs4Y
Efforts should be made to not test on animals where possible
@8RJ3P7R4yrs4Y
Yes in as humane a way as possible
@8R7JNXW4yrs4Y
Yes for essential medical safety
@8R5ZP4Y4yrs4Y
Animals should not be used for testing cosmetics, and should only be used for testing the safety of medicine when it’s absolutely necessary
It should only be used if there is clear proof that it does not harm the animal mentally or physically.
@8QKWQ7M4yrs4Y
Yes, but also increase the use of simulators to compare data.
@8Q4NVPH4yrs4Y
Yes, but only animals like rats and smaller creatures that have a short life span. And as long as their living environments in test facilities are adequate and accommodating
@8Q38D4Y4yrs4Y
It’s cruel on the animals however for medical reasons only
@8Q2KWDQ4yrs4Y
It's situationally dependant, honestly.
@8JB3GQMConservative4yrs4Y
Yes, but only animals such as: rats, mice, etc.
@9CVYPZF2yrs2Y
Yes. If the testing is very important
@9CFJ98L2yrs2Y
Use them on the criminals only
@995XTS22yrs2Y
No. Human testing on the worst prisoners should be implemented.
@98GDV932yrs2Y
Yes, but only if it is the last possible option to achieve success
Test on convicted paedophiles or host clinical trials
I am unqualified to answer. Is animal testing the only way of ensuring the effectiveness and safety of drugs?
@97Y33P8Liberal Democrat2yrs2Y
Animal testing. should only be acceptable in that which is necessary for human survival, e.g. it should not be used for cosmetics (and then only after extensive research has been carried out without the use of animals as test subjects
@8ZWZDRD3yrs3Y
We are the same and at one with everything on the planet, which obviously includes all animals. We should think of everything as interconnected. Any ideas of sustainability has to take this into account. Humans are not exceptional. Ethicality extends to everything.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.