Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

353 Replies

 @B3PN5ZQ answered…3wks3W

No. They should be tested on paedophiles, killers, rapists and anyone who is doing a prison sentence for beating children, elderly and disabled people.

 @9PRXCX4answered…9mos9MO

If it is for deadly diseases yes , but for any other reason no , we must try our best to live with god's creation

 @9PRFKXVanswered…9mos9MO

No, convicted criminals serving life sentences should do their part for society and be tested on. It will provide more accurate results.

 @9PM73LBWomen's Equalityanswered…9mos9MO

Although I don't agree with animal testing buy also there are so many people that have had negative effects from testing so either way isn't great

 @9PJNZYKanswered…9mos9MO

No, how can the government talk about making artificial meat for human consumption but not outlaw product testing on animals. If we can make meat safe for human consumption, we can Damm we’ll test sunscreen on it.

 @9NZBMXFanswered…10mos10MO

No, surely there are other ways to test on human tissue without using animals. If not then should only be for medical reasons, not cosmetic.

 @9JFNH8Tanswered…1yr1Y

Yes, but not for cosmetics and only as a last resort if human testing or any other forms of testing have been deemed both not possible and unethical

  @B4K3420answered…2yrs2Y

Only so long as it’s is the most scientifically efficient way of testing, should be abolished if more effective form of testing is discovered.

 @9D6NPNSLabouranswered…2yrs2Y

Yes but not for cosmetics and only rodents, no primates, cats,dogs or rabbits

 @9N29VMFanswered…10mos10MO

Yes but in accordance to ASPA laws. If there are no alternatives then the use of NHA should be approved.

 @9MZKGBCConservativeanswered…10mos10MO

Why test on animals, surely in these days of AI and high tech we should be able to get a better system of testing

 @9MZ7MJ7Plaid Cymruanswered…10mos10MO

Yes, but not for cosmetics, only when absolutely essential, and in the most humane way possible, for revolutionary drugs/vaccines not for relives to common ailments

 @9M3XW9Qanswered…11mos11MO

Researchers will continue to do it somewhere in the world, we should make sure that cruelty is minimised so that if it has to happen it should be as humane as possible. If we ban it here it will just happen somewhere else where there is less regulation and is worse for the animals.

 @9LXK8SHanswered…11mos11MO

no #savetheanimals if you were in the animals position you would not want to be used as a test subject.

 @9BNQBPNanswered…2yrs2Y

No, animals and humans are not the same. This will always be messed up.

 @96HVJ8Ranswered…2yrs2Y

 @95JNLFCanswered…3yrs3Y

 @943QDKJanswered…3yrs3Y

If it’s something for humans, then the animal might live but we die and vice versa.

 @93VFQMKanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but by licence where theyve proved there is not other way of testing apart from on animals

 @8Z7PZXYanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, under strict ethical and welfare guidance with other testing methods used where possible

 @8Y5FR43answered…3yrs3Y

 @8XDRKVBanswered…3yrs3Y

I think that animals should only be used for things that could kill human testers such as early vaccine prototypes. however, animals should not be used for makeup and cosmetics

 @8TC6JMFanswered…4yrs4Y

Yes and on humans too . we have a ready source of human guinea pigs locked up in our jails & a stream of possibilities coming through the courts .
In all honesty for a useful life & giving back some thing to the society they live in could they be utilized this type of research for a payment of release & income support/ compensation for a few years or looked after if they are damaged beyond repair or survival. It would certainly be more cost effective all round than keeping them locked up or on the permanent merry go round of jail , release reoffending , getting caught again , jail etc. .

Perhaps these Chinese really are far more advanced than the so called civilised western world .

 @8SSXP8Ranswered…4yrs4Y

Only for situations where it is impossible not to e.g. vaccines, or untested vital medicines. Animals should never be used for any other reasons.

 @8SMCBY2answered…4yrs4Y

I am for testing the safety of drugs that are designed to improve animal welfare. I am strongly against testing cosmetics and such for human use.

 @8SL6C6Canswered…4yrs4Y

If it is potential to effect life or death yes or certain criminals, not for cosmetic purposes

 @8SJR2LSLabouranswered…4yrs4Y

No it should be for criminals who have committed sexual, murder or terror offences.

 @8SJGYM7answered…4yrs4Y

Definitely not for cosmetic testing. As for medical testing only in cases of extreme need (e.g. cancer treatments) & once they are in final stages of testing. Setup initiatives in correctional facilities for inmates to volunteer for testing. They should receive monetary compensation (to be given upon release) and it should count as hours served towards community service.

 @8RL5VLDanswered…4yrs4Y

 @8R5ZP4Yanswered…4yrs4Y

Animals should not be used for testing cosmetics, and should only be used for testing the safety of medicine when it’s absolutely necessary

 @8QYVZQTGreenanswered…4yrs4Y

It should only be used if there is clear proof that it does not harm the animal mentally or physically.

 @8QKWQ7Manswered…4yrs4Y

 @8Q4NVPHanswered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but only animals like rats and smaller creatures that have a short life span. And as long as their living environments in test facilities are adequate and accommodating

 @8Q38D4Yanswered…4yrs4Y

 @995XTS2answered…2yrs2Y

 @98GDV93answered…2yrs2Y

 @988Y258Labouranswered…2yrs2Y

I am unqualified to answer. Is animal testing the only way of ensuring the effectiveness and safety of drugs?

 @97Y33P8Liberal Democratanswered…2yrs2Y

Animal testing. should only be acceptable in that which is necessary for human survival, e.g. it should not be used for cosmetics (and then only after extensive research has been carried out without the use of animals as test subjects

 @8ZWZDRDanswered…3yrs3Y

We are the same and at one with everything on the planet, which obviously includes all animals. We should think of everything as interconnected. Any ideas of sustainability has to take this into account. Humans are not exceptional. Ethicality extends to everything.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...