There is increasing unease in Washington about China’s nuclear ambitions.
The Pentagon says Beijing is on track to double the number of its nuclear warheads by the decade’s end, to 1,000 from 500 — a development that senior U.S. officials have publicly called “unprecedented” and “breathtaking.” China has drastically expanded its nuclear testing facility and continued work on three new missile fields in the country’s north, where more than 300 intercontinental ballistic missile silos have recently been constructed.
China’s transformation from a small nuclear power into an exponentially larger one is a historic shift, upending the delicate two-peer balance of the world’s nuclear weapons for the entirety of the atomic age. The Russian and American arsenals — their growth, reduction and containment — have defined this era; maintaining an uneasy peace between the two countries hinged on open communication channels, agreement on nuclear norms and diplomacy.
In February, in a rare offer for nuclear diplomacy, China openly invited the United States and other nuclear powers to negotiate a treaty in which all sides would pledge never to use nuclear weapons first against one another. “The policy is highly stable, consistent and predictable,” said Sun Xiaobo, director general of the Chinese foreign ministry’s Department of Arms Control, in Geneva on Feb. 26. “It is, in itself, an important contribution to the international disarmament process.”
The invitation came…
At a follow-on meeting in November, the United States proposed possible measures to manage nuclear risks, such as an agreement to notify one another when their militaries test-launch ballistic missiles.
Read more.Here are the top political news stories for today.
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
How do you feel about the idea of one country significantly increasing its nuclear arsenal in today’s world?
@9LKDD6T2yrs2Y
Not really bothered as 1 Nuke is enough to cause damage
@9LKCTQG2yrs2Y
It is reflective of increasing global uncertainty surrounding climate/resources and global balances of power. More nations should consider increasing stocks.
@9LKCRMC2yrs2Y
No opinion, I would prefer all cou tries to have zero war heads however as this is unlikely I would rather the UK did not contribute to the ame as before
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
Do you believe that a country expanding its nuclear weapons poses a threat to global peace, or is it a form of self-defense?
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
What are your thoughts on the concept of 'no first use' policies for nuclear weapons? Do you think they are enough to prevent nuclear war?
@9LKCTQG2yrs2Y
Yes, but only if there are treaties on interception and that sovereign nations aren't beholden to other nations as to their use.
@9LKCRMC2yrs2Y
No, m no nuclear weapons should be in the UK. China have no good reason to attack l, wy give them one. Let China waste their money on nuclear weapons that probability will show they will never be used
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
Join in on more popular conversations.