Should the government increase temporary housing to accommodate immigrants and refugees?

No, empty all migrant hotels and deport all illegal migrants

The government should simplify the process so those that claim asylum are processed quickly giving only those with a genuine claim the right to stay.

Not until our homeless citizens are housed

Refugees should be supported but financial immigrants should be self sufficient and use existing systems when needed

They should focus on giving temporary housing to homeless citizens of the country first and then immigrants and refugees without citizenship

No, immigrants shouldn't be put in houses, prioritize the homeless.

Only if they came legally

only to refugees

Yes, we should invest in purpose build infrastructure rather than hotels or private rentals

Yes and No, I'll explain increase temporary housing to not pay hotels high fees. However the problem is to deport the immigrants and refugees.

There is already temporary housing for the immigrants and asylum seekers.

i think they should do this for the people who are in desperate need of a home and have their background checked

Yes, but increase temporary housing for all people that need it.

No, because temporary accommodation should not be available to those without long term connections or work.

No, temporary housing should be linked to either long term connections or work.

No, people should inly be entitled to temporary accommodation if they have a connection to the area through long term residency or work.

If it’s a matter of urgency & safety, yes.

Yes, but only to refugees

No, the government should speed up the process of settling asylum claims.

The government should build millions more homes anyway, regardless of the number of immigrants and refugees.

I think the current amount is enough from what I have seen, although I am not too well read on this topic.

Yes but only refugees

Honestly housing for actual citizens is already an issue so we should be focusing on that

No, send them back

Yes, but they should prioritise reducing the asylum application process to reduce the need for temporary housing.

They need to improve the approval/visa system rather than just create more housing to accommodate (to quicker process these cases)

No, we should focus on giving temporary housing to the homeless in this country

No help them integrate into society

No, focus on the backlog so less accommodation is needed

No, but incentivise/enable immigrants and refugees to work immediately from arrival, enabling them to access good-quality housing.

no we must build good centrese where people are protected and processed quickly

No, hire more people to get through asylum backlog and let people contribute to the economy via tax

Only to those who have entered the country legally

Yes, but away from communities because it stokes violence and leaves the immigrants feeling threatened.

Yes, but only as a short term measure. Long term the immigration system needs to be reformed to reduce the need for temporary accommodation

Never - Especially as the question has not put ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS in the group of people.

Yes, but we should focus on housing citizens first

No, they should process claims faster

Yes, but only ones who have based tight screening.

yes if they would be able to get jobs and are working

There needs to be more available housing for immigrants and refugees especially as granting asylum is taking so much longer but no privatised hotels or housing which can be profited off by billionaires

No, but there needs to be a better system than the current one.

Yes only if they are able to provide housing to address the current housing crisis

no and deport ALL ILLEGAL immigrants

No - instead allow immigrants to work and earn their own money whilst contributing to taxation. Temporary accommodation then is just that - they should be able to work and afford to rent privately.

Yes for refugees not immigrants

They need to increase the availability of all housing stock for everyone. Refugees should have their cases quickly assessed, so they can start working to pay their own way

Only for refugees seeking asylum or escaping war. Also if an immigrant has a valid reason for leaving their country such as women in middle eastern countries that cant show their faces and bodies. i think thats a valid reason for leaving

Government should build immigrations centres to hold and properly care/ for people while sorting their visa

Immigrants should be housed in camps specifically designed for the purpose whilst undergoing processing

No, at least not in council residential properties or private renting properties or if they were to be, have it so they have to qualify in the same system as British residents to qualify for council housing, in an attempt to tackle the overall crisis in housing.

No, house them in military bases instead to process them before deciding if we can release them into the community and approve their asylum application

No. Utilise alternative arrangements for housing immigrants and refugees. Tents, ex-military compounds, etc.

Yes, but build more council housing to permanently house everyone and allow refugees and migrants to work

Yes, however only to aid those who need it while finding a job. Once they are in a secure job that housing would be removed from them and they could find their own.

Refugees should be distributed into depopulated rural areas. Immigrants should be given work visas and citizenship after 5 years. Asylum seekers should have access to a British Consulate to apply in their own country.

Yes, but not in hotels in the country. there should be specified zones where these accommodations should be made that prohibit the migrants from entering the rest of the country. Illegal immigrants shouldn't be held in these and should be immediately deported.

No and those immigrants/refugees should be immediately deported to their country of origin or to a third country.

Have an annual limit of migrants and refugees for a fixed housing. They will have to move out when they are capable of buying/renting a house when they working.

With the little funding the government personally give to asylum seekers then it shouldn't be left to the tax payer to provide.

Temporary Housing isn’t helping immigrants and refugees, we should find way to help them into work and permanent housing, also build more social housing.

The government should ban second home ownership whilst paying 50% rate for property with a mortgage, and 75% rate to people with fully paid mortgages. This housing should then be repurposed as council homes, available to both citizens and immigrants+refugees alongside a streamlined immigration claim process to encourage these people into the workforce.

Yes, but British homeless should be given priority

Yes but need legal citizens and people living in the UK has to benefit as well

No. We are providing too much stuff for immigrants.

No this should be for the homeless and for victims of abuse and neglect within our own country

Yes, but each person needs a criminal background, they’ll be given a basic job, and the government has to help with citizenship, and a small house depending on family size

Yes, and build more housing for the homeless and those who are awaiting citizenship

housing for our own before Immigrants and reugee's

No, I believe a better solution is to expand social housing as this can help contribute to temporary housing for refugees but also help citizens be able to rent a home.

Yes, unless they're anti western terrorist men in which case send them back after a night

No, if someone is here on a visa they should pay for their own housing, refugees should be placed in designated areas

Only if they are refugees or immigrants wanting to be involved in working in this nation

Provide the housing requried for the volume of people. Improve the process to enable refugees to work as soon as they arrive and thereby give back.

Yes but only if they have come to the country legally

They should but they shouldn't ruin natural habitats and fields for housing.

No, we should make detention camps in the Northern Scottish Isles until they have been identified and accepted (most of the time they won't be)

the government should increase council housing to house immigrants and those with low income that are british

No because provisions should be made to favour local needs, however reform to the conditions qnd locations of these accommodations

Yes, but we should also promote processing at embassies to discourage channel crossings and reduce the number of those in hotels.

The immigration system needs to be reformed. By increasing temporary housing, this isn't fixing the backlog problem, it's just allowing it to grow, if the immigration system is effectively reformed to allow asylum claimants to be processed through the system faster, it would mean the state of limbo which has created this housing problem to dissipate.

Increase for people who are already here and British citizens

Yes, but as UK citizens we should be able to have better housing rights than immigrants

No, because the housing shouldn’t be temporary but permanent

Increase permanent and long term housing, not temporary housing

Yes but only to some extent. There is a lot of overcrowding in this country, and big apartment buildings, temporary housing and big estates usually just look ugly and are overcrowded.

They should increase temporary housing but not just for immigrants and refugees

Yes, as well as housing for all poor people who need it.

Temporary but seek a solution to stop people from risking their lives and have a chance to live in their countries safe by investing and looking after them

Yes but the Government should overall be spending more on social housing anyway

No, but speed up the process of screening so they can start work faster

No. Any refuge should be temporary, or better still they should all be relocated back to safe zones in their own continents.

Yes, in proper houses or apartments, not prison ships

For Refugees yes but not for work based or education immigrants as they dont need to flee wars or horrible events

Housing should be dedicated to British residents first