Should all state schools be required to follow a standard curriculum?

Get rid of the current curriculum. High school is far too out of date and out of touch. Be more practical and hands on with how children learn. It took me till college to find something I could relate to being taught by people who I respected because they respected me. Stop worrying about algebra and Shakespeare and get into the 21st century. The next generation will thank you for it.

yes but it should be designed by teachers and should consider the individual child not be written my MPs who aren't qualified or knowledgeable on how best to teach children

There should be the same standard for each age across the country, but teachers should be able to craft their own teaching to the actual students they have in front of them.

A standard curriculum should take up no more than 50% of the school week.

Teachers should be able to develop curriculum content that is best suited for their students while under guidance from

Yes, but allow flexibility for non-core subjects and teachers should teach to the needs of each student and region

School age children should not be taught a left wing agenda, pro EU propaganda, or 'alternative lifestyles'. English/British history needs to be taught, not, European, or whatever it is they teach now.

Generally yes, but allow for greater autonomy for schools to meet the needs of the local cohorts.

Yes, but that curriculum needs to place an emphasis on multiple different forms of learning and should allow flexibility based on the needs of the children and the expertise of the staff.

I believe all schools should follow a standardised national curriculum to ensure equal access to education for all pupils, regardless of the type of school they attend. A consistent curriculum would help ensure that every child is taught the same core knowledge and skills, reducing inequalities between schools and regions.

While schools may benefit from some flexibility in how subjects are delivered, the content and educational standards should remain consistent, so no pupil is disadvantaged by where they are educated.

Yes, but this standard curriculum should not be strict, it should merely outline a non-specific guide. For example, enforcing that history doesn't teach from a Eurocentric view, but not necessarily telling them which historical events to focus on.

Only Maths and English should be Core. Otherwise students should have full flexibility from Year 6 (Primary 6 in Scotland) onwards

Have a standard curriculum with flexibility for students with different requirements, abilities, and access.

Yes. An what is taught needs to be radically reassessed. The basics of '3 R's', solid history, civics, critical thinking, financial management, health and wellbeing. The core skills we all need to function properly in society.

No, such curriculums are heavily disadvantageous and sometimes even harmful towards disabled students

Yes but allow for flexibility for non-core subjects and teachers should teach to the needs of each students and region

The national curriculum should be completely reformed. Functional skills qualifications should be required from Year 7 to Year 9 with the option to complete GCSEs in core subjects in Year 10 and Year 11. For those not wishing to take GCSEs in core subjects, a greater variety of what would be optional GCSE subjects should be made available and these should be linked to the local area and businesses where possible.

No, that's should be decided by the region they are in but that said the Government should be allowed to choose mandatory 'special' topics for parts of the curriculum.

Yes, but place more emphasis on core science and sociological teachings rather than English and Maths.

Yes, but it should be changed to focus on essential life skills that parents cannot necessarily teach e.g. personal finance, politics, home economics, etc. as well as core subjects such as English and Maths

No, y debemos privatizar más escuelas para que libremente los docentes y padres de familia armen el currículo sin influencia estatal.

I agree with it personally but it should not be mandatory and schools should be free to choose what and how they teach

Not the cirriculum but the ALL exams in English, Math and science that students have to complete should be the same across the country.

Teachers should teach for needs of each student and region as well as flexibility in class of the schools in which the students attend.

The curriculum is massively outdated and needs a complete overhaul. Teach subjects that are relevant to current times and teach kids taxes and bank accounts, how to maintain a house and grow and produce your own food.

Yes, but allow flexibility for non-core subjects and KS3. We should also regularly revisit the national curriculum to keep it up-to-date and relevant.

Yes, but the current curriculum is out of date and has failed to progress at the rate of the changing world. There should also be some choice for students within the curriculum.

Yes, but the curriculum should be altered so that it does not have an upper class habitus, reduce ethnocentrism (especially the institutional racism), and just be made more equal and attainable for all students

Yes, but the curriculum must be changed to reduce ethnocentricity and reduce reliance on cultural capital

There should be a basic standard of maths, English, science, geography, domestic education i.e. cooking, managing finances, understanding politics- , but allow flexibility to cater for neurodiverse students, non-academics - play to children's strengths.

Yes but stick to it and know that not all pupils will maintain the standard and that’s okay. The children aren’t failures because of it .

Yes so long as there are no social aspects involved. Curriculum should be based on standard subjects (Maths, English, Science)

Teachers should be allowed to deliver areas of the curriculum that will have a positive impact on student engagement and outcomes

The school system needs to be reinvented and started to treat every child as an individual and support their individual needs and skills

Yes standardised curriculum. But no more lgbtq+ and over sexualisation of children. Pushing adult fetish ideologys onto young children is inappropriate.

No. The curriculum needs complete reform to better equip children with holistic life skills education

Yes, but curriculums should have a level of flexibility in terms of how the information is taught in order to accomodate students who don't learn in the 'standard' way, eg. Disabled students.

Yes, but the curriculum needs to be changed based on what has worked elsewhere - like Japan and nutrition.

Yes but I think the standard curriculum needs an overhaul. I don’t the the education in schools is up to standard and I think there needs to more opportunities for humanities and arts.

All subjects other than history should be standardised. History should be adapted to teach the local history of each individual school.

English, other languages, mathematics, basic sciences and history should be taught alongside incentivising job apprenticeships for 16 year olds and older.

Teachers should be able to teach beyond the national curriculum however there should be a level of standardisation in order to aim for equal opportunity

The curriculum should be modernised to consider abilities and skills of all students (maths simplified for those who struggle with things not needed in everyday life (Pythagoras), art and design given more time, building work etc)

Yes, for core subjects, maths, English, science, foreign languages, Sex Ed. New subjects must be introduced, financial well-being, basic maintenance (house/car)

Follow a basic curriculum for maths and English especially for life e.g. household planning, pensions and ability to discuss verbally and in writing ideas and theories. More variety of choice dependent on learners needs and interests. Equivalent half day creativity art, music, gardening and half day physical activity.

Teachers should teach to the needs and each student and region HOWEVER there needs to be a level of standardisation to ensure a well rounded education

No. All children should be taught some things at a certain level. Reading, writing, Maths etc. But there needs to be more emphasis on LIFE SKILLS and teaching based on children as individuals.

Yes but it should be followed by ALL schools, after all the specialists and consultants have deemed it to be the best curriculum

Yes, but the content of the curriculum should be reviewed and be a "basic level" which would allow flexibility and the ability to teach to the needs of students.

Yes, but the needs of the children, demographic of the area and non-core subjects should allow the teachers flexibility. Having a general standard curriculum that is flexible will provide an even footing for all.

Yes, but reduce the size of the curriculum so that fundamentals are focussed on and additional time is available for flexible discovery

No, but important socio-cultural issues should be addressed and a curriculum of core skills should be targeted. Learning should be more individualised and more control given to the students, this might inspire more students and actually lift the veil on learning for them instead of it being about learning anything specifically.

Yes, but change the core curriculum to include essential life skills, such as cooking, personal finance etc so students are prepared for life ahead

Yes, but teachers should be given the flexibility to adapt that curriculum to the needs of their pupils

Yes, but eith flexibility for interest of students as long as long as they are given the details needed to pass exams

Yes, but the curriculum should be expanded, with more options and greater diversity so that teachers can have more flexibility based on their students, region and expertise.

no, but guidance classes should be required from primary school and we should try to encourage more diverse topics

I think there should be a standard curriculum, but I feel that schools should be able to offer non-gcse options for those children who are unable to study at that level

Yes but this curriculum needs to eliminate wasted lesson and teach children real life lessons such as recycling, money, mortgages and social reasoning.

There should be flexibility according to the needs of the students and the region and the way in which they are taught, not necessarily the content.

Yes and have children be in school for more hours to allow for parents to work longer. The timetables should be flexible and with longer hours, we wouldn’t be trying to squeeze so much into one lesson.

Yes, but the curriculum should be modernised to be more relevant and allow flexibility for other subjects

Yes, but the standard curriculum needs to be diversified and not hide the horrific parts of British history

Yes, and this should incorporate a strong patriotic and citizenship ethic but allow flexibility in teaching methods across all subjects.

Yes, for parity, but allow flexibility for needs of students for vacational/ academic/ additional support/ progression

Yes, as long as it is defined by an independent commission and flexibility is allowed for non-core subjects

Yes, but there should be room to explore issues beyond the curriculum or go deeper into certain issues

I believe school should teach only what's necessary, as a default, as well as life skills and about all different kinds of people and things in existence, so that they understand the world and know how to effectively survive within it. Anything else should be optional.

The standard curriculum does not fit all, there needs to be more vocational classes.

Yes, but the standard curriculum should include more on politics, life and the real british history.

Yes but only for core subjects

Yes. But the curriculum should only be an outline and be flexible.

Yes, but only for English and Mathematics up to Tertiary level.

Yes, but there should be flexibility to make local history and culture part of the curriculum.

The Education system is too centric on England, each state should teach local history and focus on other histories later. I also think LLW is more like Learning Left Wing Propaganda or Learning for Life and Work

No, there should be minimum base standards for what is taught but curriculum should be able to be adapted for each class to best sit their needs. base standards for what should be taught, flexibility in how it is taught

There should be a fixed core element of the curriculum, implemented by all schools (with sensitivity to the need for some exceptions, for example for special needs schools). For the non-core part, schools should have flexibility to choose from a range of standardised modules.

Curriculums need to be a lot more flexibile with a lot more focus on education and building skills and a railored education that suits each individual and less focus on statistics of test pass-rates

The curriculum needs an overhaul so that students are taught actual live skills more then advanced maths that most won't ever use again

Yes but I think we should adopt a new teaching system similar to the Steiner method of teaching as it gives kids a more well rounded consistent education instead of cramming for exams and the forgetting the information straight after p, it also gives student more freedom to explore which subjects they like at a more in depth specific level instead of asking them to choose what they want to do at 18 with little to no experience of any of their options

English, Maths, Science, PE & IT should be mandatory however, other subjects should be chosen by students based on their skills and interests. bring back home economics, teach sign language and first aid and possibly polictics.

Yes but its outdated we need to focus on now - maths for example teach about mortgages, taxes, pensions, debt etc

Students should be able to access further curriculum if finding core curriculum is not challenging enough

In an ideal world each student would be taught to their specific needs. However in an over populated school this is not achievable for teachers and there must be a standardised datum that they can refer to. A good teacher (given sufficient time and resources) should be able to assist students requiring further help

Yes but the whole curriculum needs to be overhauled. It is currently too academic centric with not enough focus on real world skills.

There should be a standard curriculum but within it there should be a mix of mandatory and optional things (i.e you get a choice of which optional things to study). Teachers should also be able to tailor to the needs of pupils easily.

Yes, but allow flexibility for non-core subjects as we all flexibility to the needs of each student and region

The curriculum is broken and teaches nothing to do with the real world. Overhaul is needed massively

Yes for core subjects but teachers should teach to the needs of each student and religion where applicable

No there should be balance and flexibility of academic and vocational studies that reflect the individual talents and passions.

Some flexibility should be allowed as well as taking other students needs into account but should follow the basic English,Maths,science etc.

Yes stop expecting schools to do a decent job of educating while trying to teach everything from potty training to how to worship... time and place for these things...elsewhere

Yes, but a standard curriculum should be highly flexible and more a a loose collection of guidelines rather than a fully standard curriculum

Yes each student should receive the same education. But all curriculum should encourage and support diversity and inclusive education. They should also teach practical skills like taxes etc

Yes, but allow flexibility for non-core subjects but ALSO teachers should teach to the needs of each student and region

Yes, but modernise the curriculum. Teach children about finances, relationships and how to look after themselves. Cooking, nutrition and hygiene. Sadly not all children have good parents. Teach them practical skills.

Yes, but there should be flexibility for non-core subjects and options of different subjects and educational arrangements.

Students should be taught lessons that help them get a job in the future and not be forced to sit in religious classes opposed to their own religion

No, curricula should be decided with the parents at the constituent country and local school district level